Madras High Court Considers Validity of University Orders on UGC Regulations. Autonomous Colleges Filed Petitions Raising Questions on Compliance with UGC Norms versus Autonomy.
27 Mar 2025...
Search Results for "Article 320"
489 result(s) found
Found 489 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Trade Union's Writ Petition Challenging Industrial Court Order in Recovery Proceeding Under MRTU & PULP Act — Recovery Application Filed Beyond Limitation Period Held Not Maintainable. The court upheld the Industrial Court's finding that the application under Section 50 of the MRTU & PULP Act was barred by limitation as it was not filed within the prescribed period.
9 Apr 2026The petitioner, Vidyu Metallics Employees Union, a trade union registered under the Trade Unions Act, 1923, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 a...
- 137
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Termination of Temporary Civil Judge's Services Under M.P. Temporary Service Rules, 1960. Order Found Non-Punitive and Article 311 Not Attracted as It Did Not Cast Any Stigma.
29 Apr 1969The appeal arose from a writ petition filed by a temporary Civil Judge in the State of Madhya Pradesh challenging the termination of his services. The...
- 14
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Review Petition in Specific Performance Suit — No Error Apparent on Face of Record. Court upholds its earlier judgment reversing High Court's partial decree for specific performance, holding that the petitioner failed to prove readiness and willingness and that the suit was barred by limitation.
18 Nov 2024The petitioner, M/s Siddamsetty Infra Projects Pvt. Ltd., filed a review petition under Article 137 of the Constitution read with Order XLVII Rule 1 o...
- 757
Supreme Court
Article 227 Cannot Override Order VII Rule 11 CPC | Supreme Court Restores Plaint Wrongly Struck Off by High Court (2026 INSC 121)
3 Feb 2026The Supreme Court held that the High Court erred in striking off the plaint under Article 227 of the Constitution when a specific remedy under Order V...
- 908
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Husband and In-Laws in Matrimonial Dispute Due to Insufficient and Vexatious Allegations. The Court found allegations under Sections 420, 498A, 506 IPC and Sections 3, 4 Dowry Prohibition Act were general and omnibus without specific particulars, constituting abuse of process under Section 482 CrPC.
5 Feb 2024The Supreme Court heard appeals arising from two orders of the Andhra Pradesh High Court dated 11.11.2022 and 23.11.2022, which refused to quash crimi...
- 303
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Dowry Harassment Case Due to Settlement and Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction. Marriage dispute between husband and wife leads to quashing of criminal proceedings under Section 482 CrPC as parties amicably settled and FIR was lodged at a place with no jurisdiction.
27 Aug 2012The applicants, including the husband Ashish Mali and his family members, filed an application under Sections 482 and 483 of the Code of Criminal Proc...
- 138
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition as Not Maintainable Against Interim Maintenance Order Under Section 125(2) Cr.P.C. — Interim Order Under Section 125(2) Cr.P.C. Is Interlocutory and Not Subject to Revision Under Section 19(4) of Family Court Act.
12 Jan 2024The revision petition was filed by the wife and minor child against an order dated 24.07.2020 passed by the IV Additional Principal Family Judge, Mysu...
- 348
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Case Against Family Members. Court holds that mere relationship with the drawer of a cheque does not attract vicarious liability under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 without specific allegations of involvement in the transaction.
11 Aug 2011The petitioners, 22 individuals who are family members of the drawer of a dishonoured cheque, filed a criminal writ petition under Article 226 of the ...
- 69
High Court
KAHC010059832012_1
21 Jun 2016The available text of the judgment only includes the list of parties in W.P.No.27674/2012 and connected cases, filed as a Public Interest Litigation b...
- 46
