Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Case Against Family Members. Court holds that mere relationship with the drawer of a cheque does not attract vicarious liability under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 without specific allegations of involvement in the transaction.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 8
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, 22 individuals who are family members of the drawer of a dishonoured cheque, filed a criminal writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking quashing of FIR No. 550 of 2011 registered at Bhoom Police Station, District Osmanabad, for offences under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The respondent no.2, Gokul Trimbak Darade, had lodged the complaint alleging that a cheque issued by one of the petitioners was dishonoured. The petitioners contended that they had no role in the transaction and were merely family members of the drawer. The court, after hearing the parties, observed that the allegations in the FIR did not disclose any specific involvement of the petitioners in the issuance of the cheque. The court held that vicarious liability under Section 138 of the NI Act cannot be imposed merely on the basis of relationship with the drawer. The FIR was quashed as it amounted to an abuse of the process of law. The court allowed the petition and quashed the FIR against all petitioners.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Negotiable Instruments Act - Quashing of FIR - Section 138, Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Vicarious Liability - The petitioners, family members of the drawer of a dishonoured cheque, sought quashing of FIR alleging that they were not involved in the transaction. The court held that mere relationship with the drawer does not attract vicarious liability under Section 138 without specific allegations of involvement in the issuance of the cheque. The FIR was quashed as an abuse of process of law. (Paras 1-4)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the FIR and criminal proceedings against the petitioners, who are family members of the drawer of a dishonoured cheque, can be quashed for lack of prima facie case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is allowed. The FIR No. 550 of 2011 registered at Bhoom Police Station, District Osmanabad, is quashed and set aside. Rule is made absolute accordingly.

Law Points

  • Vicarious liability under Section 138 NI Act requires specific allegations of involvement
  • mere relationship insufficient
  • quashing of FIR for abuse of process
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2011 LawText (BOM) (08) 9

Criminal Writ Petition No. 550 of 2011

2011-08-11

Shrihari P. Davare

Mr. Y.B. Bolkar for petitioners, Smt. Y.M. Kshirsagar for respondent no.1, Mr. A.B. Girase for respondent no.2

Bhaurao Kisan Nagtilak and others

The State of Maharashtra and Gokul Trimbak Darade

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal writ petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India seeking quashing of FIR for cheque dishonour under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought quashing of FIR No. 550 of 2011 registered at Bhoom Police Station.

Filing Reason

Petitioners, family members of the drawer of a dishonoured cheque, were implicated in the FIR despite having no involvement in the transaction.

Issues

Whether the FIR against the petitioners can be quashed for lack of prima facie case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that they were not involved in the cheque transaction and were merely family members of the drawer. Respondent no.2 argued that the petitioners were liable under Section 138 of the NI Act.

Ratio Decidendi

Mere relationship with the drawer of a dishonoured cheque does not attract vicarious liability under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Specific allegations of involvement in the transaction are necessary to maintain a prosecution. Quashing of FIR is justified to prevent abuse of process of law.

Judgment Excerpts

Heard learned Counsel for the parties. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith.

Procedural History

The petitioners filed Criminal Writ Petition No. 550 of 2011 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking quashing of FIR. The court heard the parties and passed the judgment on 11th August 2011.

Acts & Sections

  • Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881: 138
  • Constitution of India: 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Case Against Family Members. Court holds that mere relationship with the drawer of a cheque does not attract vicarious liability under Section 138 of the Negotiable Ins...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Landlords' Petition in Tenancy Declaration Case — MRT Order Set Aside for Failure to Consider Relevant Evidence. The court held that the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal must consider all relevant evidence, including the relati...