Trending :
Lawtext
Search
Login / Register
Sign In
HomeJudgement
Scroll Down To Discover
High Court

Madras High Court Considers Validity of University Orders on UGC Regulations. Autonomous Colleges Filed Petitions Raising Questions on Compliance with UGC Norms versus Autonomy.

High Court: Madras High Court Bench: Principal
Admin
2026-09-13 06:51:24
  • 75
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Issue of Consideration

Writ Petition Nos.18165, 18315, 18923, 19271,

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (MAD) (03) 186

WP.Nos.18165, 18315, 18923, 19271, 19318 & 19319 of 2023 and 24801 of 2024

2025-03-27

N. Anand Venkatesh

2025:MHC:799

The Principal & Secretary, Women's Christian College, The Principal Secretary, Madras Christian College, The Secretary & Correspondent, Loyola College, The Secretary, Stella Maris College, The Secretary, Sacred Heart Arts & Science College

The State of Tamil Nadu, The Director of Collegiate Education, The Regional Joint Director of Collegiate Education, Chennai Region, The Joint Director of Collegiate Education, Vellore Region, The University of Madras, The Annamalai University, The University Grants Commission

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking to quash university letters on UGC regulation compliance

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for records relating to impugned orders issued by respondent universities and quash them

Procedural History

Writ petitions filed under Article 226; heard on 2025-03-20; reserved on same day; judgment delivered on 2025-03-27

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 226
  • University Grants Commission Regulations, 2018:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Tags :
UGC Regulations, 2018 Certiorarified Mandamus Autonomous Colleges University of Madras Annamalai University Higher Education Department Writ Petition Article 226

Pay once for this file or subscribe for unlimited downloads

Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Disciplinary Authority's Compulsory Retirement Order in Police Misconduct Case; Tribunal's Interpretation of Rule 3(b) Reversed. Rule 3(b) of Tamil Nadu Civil Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules Does Not Require the Authority... 2026-09-14 23:15:43
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Enhances Compensation for Claimants in Motor Accident Death Case — Tribunal's Award Modified for Loss of Dependency and Future Prospects. The Court applied multiplier of 18 and added 40% future prospects to the income of the... 2026-09-14 23:15:40
Categories
Popular Tags
writ petition Natural Justice acquittal murder compensation burden of proof limitation Article 226 benefit of doubt land acquisition
Follow Us

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensation Cases,...

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Upho...

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Spec...

Bombay High Court Dismisses MBBS Student's Writ Petition Seeking Fourth Attempt in Anatomy...

High Court of Bombay Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Tenancy Orders Under Bombay Tenancy ...

Supreme Court Acquits Appellant in Prevention of Corruption Act Case Due to Absence of Pec...

Supreme Court Modifies High Court Order Appointing Different Arbitrator Under Section 11 o...

Supreme Court Upholds Scrutiny Committee Invalidation of Scheduled Tribe Caste Claim but P...

Supreme Court Allows Homebuyers' Appeal and Waives Time Extension Charges Imposed by Devel...

Supreme Court Dismisses Insurer's and Claimant's Appeals in Motor Accident Death Compensat...

Lost Your Password?