Search Results for "time barred"

5531 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 5531 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Customs Reference Application for Non-Compliance with Time Limit Under Section 130A(4) of Customs Act, 1962. CESTAT's failure to submit statement of case within 120 days renders reference time-barred, leading to discharge of bank guarantee.

The petitioners, Asit C. Mehta Financial Services Limited and Asit C. Mehta, filed a writ petition seeking dismissal of Customs Application No. 28 of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Challenge to Waqf Tribunal's Interim Order in Property Dispute. The Revision Application Raised Jurisdictional Question Regarding the Competence of a Single-Member Tribunal After the 2013 Amendment to the Waqf Act, Without a Transitory Provision.

The case arose from a civil revision under Section 83(9) of the Waqf Act, 1995, filed by the original defendants (Magnum Developers and others) challe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Examines Company Law Board's Power to Direct Issue of Shares Under Section 111 of Companies Act, 1956. The appeal raises the question whether the Board can order issuance of share certificates and rectification of register absent valid transfer documents.

This company appeal arose from an order of the Company Law Board (CLB) dated 14 January 2013 in Company Petition No. 23 of 2012. The CLB had directed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Arbitration Petition Challenging Award Rejecting Salvor's Claims for Idling Charges in Salvage Contract Dispute. Court upholds arbitral tribunal's finding that salvor failed to prove breach of contract and damages, and that claims were barred by accord and satisfaction.

The case involves a challenge under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, to an arbitral award passed by a three-member tribunal i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Commercial Arbitration Dispute. Court upholds award under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, finding no patent illegality or conflict with public policy.

The petitioner, Ramakrishnan Krishnan, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in SARFAESI Act Case on Jurisdictional Grounds. Civil Suit Barred Under Section 34 as Debt Recovery Tribunal Has Exclusive Authority Over Securitisation Matters, Despite Allegations of Fraud in Assignment Agreement.

The dispute arose from a loan agreement dated 26.07.2011, where the appellant acted as a guarantor for a corporate debtor. After the corporate debtor ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeals in Property Dispute Between Brothers, Remands for Fresh Consideration on Limitation and Evidence Appreciation. The court held that the First Appellate Court must discuss evidence and cannot ignore a finding on limitation that has attained finality.

The case involves two second appeals arising from a property dispute between brothers. The appellants (Ulhas Shankar Barde and Urmila Ulhas Barde) and...