Search Results for "bombay tenancy act"

1830 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1830 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging MHADA Eviction Order in Slum Rehabilitation Case. Court upholds MHADA's jurisdiction to evict unauthorized occupants from transit accommodation under Section 3M of the Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Re-development) Act, 1971.

The judgment pertains to a writ petition filed by 16 individuals who were occupants of transit accommodation in a building known as 'Sukh Sadan' in Go...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Landowners' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation in Land Acquisition Case. Court holds that market value must reflect potential use and comparable sales, and that the Land Acquisition Officer's award is not binding on the Reference Court.

The judgment pertains to two first appeals arising from land acquisition proceedings for the benefit of the Goa Industrial Development Corporation. Th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Additional Commissioner's Orders in Gram Panchayat Disqualification Appeals. Delegation of Powers Under Section 13(3) of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 Remains Valid Despite Amendment to Section 16(2) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1958.

The petitioner, Amitkumar Bankar, challenged orders of the Additional Commissioner dated 18.01.2023 that set aside the Collector's disqualification of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Land Acquisition Award Due to Unexplained Delay of 14 Years and Availability of Alternative Remedy. Petitioner Claiming Tenancy Rights Failed to Seek Reference Under Section 18 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The petitioner, Fomento Resorts and Hotels Ltd, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the land acquisition ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Licensee's Writ Petition Challenging Eviction Order Under Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 — Petitioner Failed to Satisfy Requirement of Section 43(4)(a) for Leave to Defend. Licensee Cannot Claim Tenancy Rights After Expiry of Leave and License Agreement.

The petitioner, Amitabh Nigam, was a licensee of a flat owned by the respondents, Amit Sharma and Shiwani Sharma, under a registered leave and license...