KAHC010645132024_1
19 Dec 2025The present batch of writ appeals is directed against a common order dated 26.09.2024 passed by the learned Single Judge of the High Court of Karnatak...
Search Results for "State Chief Information Commissioner"
1876 result(s) found
Found 1876 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Quashes CVC Order Divesting CBI Director of Powers — Rule of Law and Institutional Independence Upheld. The court held that the CVC exceeded its powers under Section 8(1)(a) and 8(1)(b) of the CVC Act, 2003 read with Section 4(1) of the DSPE Act, 1946, and that the orders were invalid as they undermined the independence of the CBI Director.
8 Jan 2019The judgment arises from two writ petitions challenging the legality of three orders dated 23rd October 2018. The first order was passed by the Centra...
- 229
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Quashes CVC Order Divesting CBI Director of Powers — Rule of Law and Institutional Independence Upheld. The court held that the CVC exceeded its powers under Section 8(1)(a) and 8(1)(b) of the CVC Act, 2003 read with Section 4(1) of the DSPE Act, 1946, and that the divestment of the CBI Director's functions without due process violated the rule of law.
8 Jan 2019The judgment arises from two writ petitions challenging the legality of three orders dated 23 October 2018. The first order was passed by the Central ...
- 411
High Court
High Court Allows Writ Petition for Approval of Peon Appointment in Private School, Overturns Education Officer's Rejection Based on Procedural Issues and Ban
2 Feb 2026The petitioners, including a school management and an appointed peon, filed a writ petition challenging the Education Officer's rejection of approval ...
- 607
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Promote Inspectors in Seniority Dispute Under Central Excise Recruitment Rules. Inter Se Seniority Must Be Fixed Based on 1959 and 1986 Office Memoranda with Quota Rule Compliance, Rejecting High Court's View on Vacancy Register Irrelevance.
15 Mar 2022The dispute originated from seniority fixation among Inspectors of Central Excise, recruited through direct recruitment and promotion under the Centra...
- 347
High Court
Bombay High Court Full Bench Considers Interpretation of Disqualification Provision in MMC Act upon Caste Certificate Invalidation. The matter involved section 16(1C)(a) of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 and its interplay with the Maharashtra Act XXIII of 2001 regarding disqualification of elected representatives on cancellation of caste certificates.
20 Oct 2006The writ petition arose from the disqualification of a municipal councillor under section 16(1C)(a) of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888. The...
- 58
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Appointment of Government Pleaders and Public Prosecutors. Court upholds State's prerogative in appointing law officers as petitioner failed to establish illegality or mala fides.
13 Sep 2006The petitioner, Mr. A.S. Shirsat, a practising advocate from Jalgaon Courts, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) before the Bombay High Court cha...
- 150
High Court
High Court Upholds Award Directing Absorption of Contract Workers as Permanent Employees. Tribunal's Finding of Sham Contract Upheld as Workers Were Directly Supervised and Paid by Principal Employer Under CLRA Act, 1970.
17 Feb 2016The Airports Authority of India (AAI), a statutory body, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the Award dated 26 Ma...
- 98
High Court
Bombay High Court Examines Challenge to Charge-Sheet Issued Under Rule 14 CCS (CCA) Rules Two Days Before Retirement. Department's 13-year delay in initiating proceedings and subsequent acquittal in criminal case on same facts raised questions of law.
22 Dec 2021The petitioner, a member of the Indian Revenue Service (Customs and Central Excise) recruited in 1979, was working as Additional Commissioner of Custo...
- 21
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Defreezing of Bank Accounts in Cheque-Bouncing Case — No Prima Facie Case for Freezing Under Section 102 CrPC. Court held that freezing of accounts under Section 102 CrPC is not permissible for investigation of cheque-bouncing offences under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, as the offence is non-cognizable and the bank is not a third party.
30 Jul 2019The petitioners, Manish Khandelwal, Sunil Khandelwal, and B.M. Financial Services (I) Pvt. Ltd., filed a Criminal Writ Petition before the Bombay High...
- 56
