NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 2486 OF 2005
30 Nov 2005The suit was filed by shareholders of Spice Jet Ltd, a domestic airline company formerly known as Modi Luft, which had undergone several ownership cha...
Search Results for "summary proceeding"
1691 result(s) found
Found 1691 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Heard Writ Petition Challenging Interim Stay of Consent Decree in Fraud Allegations. The Court Examined Whether Third Parties Can Apply for Recall of Consent Decree Under Order XXIII Rule 3 and Section 151 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
9 Jun 2025The writ petition arose from a challenge to an interim order of a Civil Judge staying a consent decree and restoring a disposed suit at the instance o...
- 45
High Court
Karnataka High Court Dismisses Petition to Quash POCSO Charges Due to Multiplicity of Child Victims Alleging Sexual Assault. Court Holds That Procedural Violations Do Not Vitiate Proceedings When Prima Facie Material Discloses Serious Offences, Requiring Full Trial.
10 Jun 2025The petitioner, an Assistant Professor at the Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Proce...
- 13
High Court
High Court of Bombay Considers Chamber Summons for Amendment of Execution Application to Enforce Foreign Award Against Additional Respondents. Award Holder Seeks to Hold Associate Companies and Directors Liable for Alleged Asset Stripping to Defeat Award Recovery.
7 Feb 2020The matter concerned a Chamber Summons filed by the Award Holder in an Execution Application seeking leave to amend the application to enforce a forei...
- 39
High Court
Bombay High Court considered writ petition challenging MSME Facilitation Council award and constitutional validity of Section 16 of MSMED Act. Petitioner contended council lacked jurisdiction and award invalid due to missing signature of Chairman.
4 Oct 2021The writ petition arose from a contractual dispute between JSW Steel Ltd. (formerly Ispat Metallics India Ltd.) as petitioner and Kamlakar V. Salvi, p...
- 22
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal by Child in Conflict with Law in POCSO Case — High Court's Revision Order Set Aside Due to Lack of Jurisdiction. The remedy against a Juvenile Justice Board order under Section 18(3) of the JJ Act is an appeal under Section 101(1) to the Court of Sessions, not a revision under CrPC.
13 Dec 2024The present appeal was filed by a Child in Conflict with Law (CCL) against an order of the High Court which set aside an order of the Juvenile Justice...
- 285
High Court
Bombay High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Accused in Fatal Hit-and-Run Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence of Knowledge Under Section 304 IPC. The court held that the blood alcohol level was within permissible limits under Section 185 MV Act and that custodial interrogation was not required.
26 Jun 2024The applicant, a female MBA graduate and businesswoman, sought anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC in connection with a fatal hit-and-run acciden...
- 564
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows MCGM to Construct Storm Water Pumping Station on Disputed Land Subject to Deposit of Compensation. The court vacated the injunction against MCGM, holding that public interest and balance of convenience favored the project, with monetary compensation as adequate remedy for the claimants.
4 Sep 2024The appeal arises from a suit filed by Samarath Development Corporation and others (respondents/plaintiffs) claiming ownership of 158.05 acres of No D...
- 403
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Petition for Appointment of Arbitrator in Franchise Dispute Due to Ex-Facie Time-Barred Claims. Limitation Act, 1963 applies to Section 11(6) applications under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and the court may refuse reference where claims are hopelessly barred by limitation.
1 Mar 2024The petitioner, M/s Arif Azim Co. Ltd., a company based in Afghanistan, filed a petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, ...
- 576
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Compromise Decree in Property Suit Despite Third-Party Intervention Claim — Consent Terms Binding on Parties, Intervener's Rights Not Affected. The Court held that a compromise between the original parties does not affect the rights of a third party claiming independent title, and such third party need not be impleaded in the suit.
29 Nov 2024The judgment arises from a suit filed by Vinesh Rashmikant Shah and others (Plaintiffs) against Pee Jay Traders and others (Defendants) concerning dis...
- 397
