Search Results for "urban land"

1877 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1877 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows TDR Claim for Surrendered DP Road Land Despite No-Objection Condition. Transferable Development Rights cannot be denied merely because surrender was a condition of permission; entitlement arises from statutory scheme under Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

The petitioner, Nirmal Ujwal Credit Cooperative Society, challenged a communication dated 22.09.2014 from the Nagpur Municipal Corporation (Planning A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Landowners to Use Reserved Land for Adjacent Purposes After Lapse of Reservation Period Under MRTP Act. Reservation for shopping complex and vegetable market lapses due to non-acquisition within 10 years under Section 127 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

The petitioners, landowners of Survey Nos. 405/1, 406/2, 407/2, 410/2 and 411 of Mouza Gondia (Bk), challenged the reservation No. S169 in the Final D...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Division Bench Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Municipal Corporation's Power to Regulate Hoardings on Railway Property. Petitions seek declaration that Railway Properties exempt from local authority jurisdiction under Railways Act, 1989.

The Bombay High Court heard a batch of writ petitions filed by the Union of India (Western Railway) and numerous private advertising entities. The pet...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Order in Landlord-Tenant Dispute Under U.P. Urban Building Act. Tenant Granted Opportunity to Contest Eviction on Payment of Costs, Directed to Cooperate for Early Disposal.

The appellant-landlord filed a petition under Section 21(i)(a) of the U.P. Urban Building (Control of Letting of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972, seeking...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Building Construction in Cessed Building Area — No Violation of DCR Found. Petitioner failed to establish that the construction violated Development Control Regulations or that the building was a cessed building under MHADA.

The petitioner, Asif Abdul Sattar, filed a Public Interest Litigation before the Bombay High Court challenging the construction of a building by Respo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Demolition of Structure in Eco-Sensitive Zone. Construction in Prohibited Area Without Valid Permission Violates Environment Protection Act and CRZ Notification.

The petitioners, M/s. Sai Pushp Enterprises and Yogesh Govind Puranik, filed a writ petition challenging the demolition of their structure by the Than...