Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Demolition of Structure in Eco-Sensitive Zone. Construction in Prohibited Area Without Valid Permission Violates Environment Protection Act and CRZ Notification.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 12
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, M/s. Sai Pushp Enterprises and Yogesh Govind Puranik, filed a writ petition challenging the demolition of their structure by the Thane Municipal Corporation. The structure was located in an area declared as an eco-sensitive zone of the Sanjay Gandhi National Park. The petitioners claimed that they had obtained necessary permissions and that the demolition was carried out without prior notice, violating principles of natural justice. The respondents, including the Thane Municipal Corporation and the State of Maharashtra, argued that the construction was illegal as it was in a prohibited zone without environmental clearance. The court examined the facts and found that the structure was indeed in an eco-sensitive zone and that the petitioners had not obtained the required environmental clearance under the Environment Protection Act, 1986. The court also noted that the municipal corporation had issued a show cause notice and given an opportunity of hearing before ordering demolition. The court held that the demolition was lawful and dismissed the petition. The court emphasized that constructions in eco-sensitive zones require prior environmental clearance and that the municipal corporation was justified in taking action against unauthorized constructions.

Headnote

A) Environment Law - Eco-Sensitive Zone - Prohibited Construction - Sections 3 and 5 of Environment Protection Act, 1986 - The petitioners constructed a structure in an area declared as eco-sensitive zone of Sanjay Gandhi National Park without obtaining environmental clearance. The court held that the construction was illegal and the municipal corporation was justified in ordering demolition. (Paras 1-10)

B) Natural Justice - Show Cause Notice - Demolition - The petitioners argued that no show cause notice was given before demolition. The court found that the structure was in a prohibited zone and the demolition was carried out after due notice and opportunity of hearing. (Paras 11-15)

C) Municipal Law - Unauthorized Construction - Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 - The Thane Municipal Corporation issued a notice under Section 53 of the MRTP Act for unauthorized construction. The court upheld the demolition as the construction was without valid permission. (Paras 16-20)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the demolition of the petitioners' structure without prior notice and in violation of principles of natural justice was lawful, and whether the structure was located in an eco-sensitive zone requiring environmental clearance.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court dismissed the writ petition, upholding the demolition of the structure as lawful.

Law Points

  • Environment Protection Act
  • 1986
  • CRZ Notification
  • 2011
  • Eco-Sensitive Zone
  • Demolition
  • Natural Justice
  • Show Cause Notice
  • Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act
  • 1966
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2022 LawText (BOM) (05) 32

Writ Petition No.4725 of 2021

2022-05-09

Mr. Milind Sathe, Senior Advocate a/w. Vishal Kanade, Rajmani Varma and Girish Rao I/b. Navdeep Vora & Associates for the Petitioners; Mr. Chirag Shah a/w. Raj Adhia and Kavita Dhanuka for Respondent Nos.1 and 2 – Thane Municipal Corporation; Mr. P. P. Kakade, Government Pleader with Smt. M. S. Bane for Respondent Nos.3 and 4 – State of Maharashtra

M/s. Sai Pushp Enterprises and Yogesh Govind Puranik

Thane Municipal Corporation, Municipal Commissioner, Principal Secretary Urban Development Department, Principal Secretary Environment Department, Principal Chief Conservator of Forest and Director Sanjay Gandhi National Park, National Board of Wildlife, Union of India

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging demolition of structure by municipal corporation.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought quashing of demolition order and restoration of structure.

Filing Reason

Petitioners alleged that demolition was carried out without prior notice and in violation of principles of natural justice.

Issues

Whether the demolition of the petitioners' structure without prior notice violated principles of natural justice. Whether the structure was located in an eco-sensitive zone requiring environmental clearance. Whether the municipal corporation had jurisdiction to order demolition under the MRTP Act.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that they had obtained necessary permissions and that demolition was without notice. Respondents argued that the structure was in an eco-sensitive zone without environmental clearance and that due notice was given.

Ratio Decidendi

Construction in an eco-sensitive zone without environmental clearance is illegal, and the municipal corporation is justified in ordering demolition after due notice and opportunity of hearing.

Judgment Excerpts

The structure was located in an eco-sensitive zone of Sanjay Gandhi National Park. The petitioners had not obtained environmental clearance under the Environment Protection Act, 1986. The municipal corporation had issued a show cause notice and given an opportunity of hearing before demolition.

Procedural History

The petitioners filed a writ petition in the High Court of Bombay challenging the demolition of their structure by the Thane Municipal Corporation. The court heard arguments and dismissed the petition.

Acts & Sections

  • Environment Protection Act, 1986: 3, 5
  • Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966: 53
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Petition to File Written Statement Despite Short Delay, Sets Aside Rejection Orders with Costs. The court held that a delay of less than a month in filing written statement, coupled with an erroneous factual basis for rejecti...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Demolition of Structure in Eco-Sensitive Zone. Construction in Prohibited Area Without Valid Permission Violates Environment Protection Act and CRZ Notification.