Search Results for "ready forward"

1189 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1189 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses BDA's Appeal in Property Injunction Suit — Upholds Trial Court's Finding of No Prima Facie Title. BDA Failed to Establish Ownership Over Suit Property as Revenue Records Showed Private Ownership, and No Acquisition Proceedings Were Proven.

The judgment arises from two connected Regular First Appeals filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and dec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Husband's Revision Against Maintenance Order Under Section 125 Cr.P.C. — Quantum of Maintenance Upheld as Reasonable. The court held that the maintenance of Rs.2,500/- to wife and Rs.1,000/- to daughter is not excessive and does not warrant interference in revision.

The petitioner/husband filed a revision petition under Section 19(4) of the Family Court Act, 1984 against the order dated 10.6.2004 in Criminal Misc....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Arbitration Application Due to Non-Existence of Arbitration Agreement — No Prima Facie Case for Reference to Arbitration Under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The applicant, Unistar Metals Private Limited, filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking reference ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Application Under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Appointment of Arbitrator for Partnership Dispute. Court finds existence of arbitration clause in partnership deed and refers parties to arbitration despite dispute over dissolution.

The applicant, Mr. Palwinder Singh Samra, filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Section 11 Application for Appointment of Arbitrator in Family Dispute Over Partnership Deed. Arbitration Clause in Partnership Deed Found Valid and Binding on Parties Despite Allegations of Fraud and Non-Signatory Status.

The applicants, Hemant D. Shah HUF and Kokila H. Shah, filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking ap...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petitions Challenging State Government's Interference in University Admissions for B.Ed. Course. State Government Cannot Prescribe Admission Rules Overriding University Autonomy and NCTE Guidelines.

The petitioners, K.S. Thara and H.S. Manjunath, were graduates who sought admission to the B.Ed. course in Bharathi College of Education and Vatsalya ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(2)(f) IPC set aside as prosecutrix's testimony was unreliable and medical evidence did not support rape.

The appellant, Rajesh @ Venkatesha @ Raja @ Raju, was convicted by the District and Sessions Judge, Kodagu, Madikeri, in Sessions Case No.58/2006 for ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Father for Rape of Minor Daughter Under POCSO Act and IPC. Father-Daughter Relationship Aggravates Offence; Medical Evidence and Victim Testimony Sufficient for Conviction.

The appellant, Bandu Vishwanath Matte, was convicted by the Extra Joint District Judge & Additional Sessions Judge, Chandrapur in Special (POCSO) Case...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Petition Challenging Impleadment Order in Specific Performance Suit — Purchaser Pendente Lite Not a Necessary Party Under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC. Doctrine of Lis Pendens Binds Transferee to Decree, Making Impleadment Unnecessary.

The petitioner, Sri T.S. Mahadevaiah, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 17.1.20...