Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Application Under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Appointment of Arbitrator for Partnership Dispute. Court finds existence of arbitration clause in partnership deed and refers parties to arbitration despite dispute over dissolution.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 5
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The applicant, Mr. Palwinder Singh Samra, filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment of an arbitrator to resolve disputes arising out of a partnership deed with the respondent, Mr. Sukhvinder Singh Samra. The parties were brothers who had entered into a partnership agreement for real estate business. Disputes arose regarding the dissolution of the partnership and division of assets. The respondent opposed the application, arguing that the partnership had been dissolved and the arbitration clause no longer applied. The court, after hearing both sides, held that the arbitration clause is independent and survives the dissolution of the partnership. The court appointed a sole arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes, referring the parties to arbitration. The judgment emphasizes the separability of arbitration agreements from the main contract.

Headnote

A) Arbitration Law - Appointment of Arbitrator - Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Existence of Arbitration Agreement - The court examined whether an arbitration clause in a partnership deed survives dissolution. Held that the arbitration clause is independent and survives termination of the partnership agreement. The court appointed an arbitrator to adjudicate disputes between the parties. (Paras 1-24)

B) Partnership Law - Dissolution of Partnership - Survival of Arbitration Clause - The court considered the effect of dissolution on the arbitration agreement. Held that the arbitration clause remains valid and enforceable even after dissolution, as it is a separate agreement. (Paras 10-18)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the arbitration clause in the partnership deed survives dissolution of the partnership and whether the court should appoint an arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the application and appointed a sole arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the parties.

Law Points

  • Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act
  • 1996
  • existence of arbitration agreement
  • referral to arbitration
  • partnership dispute
  • dissolution of partnership
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (BOM) (07) 29

ARBAP(L)-15700-2026

2026-07-02

Arun R. Pedneker, J.

Mr. Rohaan Cama a/w Mr. Siddharth Samantrai and Mr. Mohit Mokali i/b Abheek Melwani for the Applicant; Mr. Mayur Khandeparkar a/w Mr. Vatsal Gosalia, Mr. Devansh Shah, Mr. Chandresh Rao and Mr. Aakash Naik for the Respondent

Mr. Palwinder Singh Samra

Mr. Sukhvinder Singh Samra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for appointment of arbitrator.

Remedy Sought

Applicant seeks appointment of an arbitrator to resolve disputes arising from a partnership deed.

Filing Reason

Disputes between brothers regarding dissolution of partnership and division of assets.

Issues

Whether the arbitration clause in the partnership deed survives dissolution of the partnership. Whether the court should appoint an arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

Submissions/Arguments

Applicant argued that the arbitration clause is independent and survives dissolution. Respondent argued that the partnership was dissolved and the arbitration clause no longer applies.

Ratio Decidendi

The arbitration clause in a partnership deed is independent and survives the dissolution of the partnership. The court has the power to appoint an arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 when an arbitration agreement exists.

Judgment Excerpts

Heard Mr. Rohaan Cama, learned counsel for the Applicant and Mr. Mayur Khandeparkar, learned counsel for the Respondent. The present Application is filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

Procedural History

The applicant filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 on 29th June 2026. The court heard both parties and pronounced judgment on 2nd July 2026.

Acts & Sections

  • Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996: Section 11
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition of APMC President Seeking to Attend State Marketing Board Meetings After Term Expiry. The court held that the petitioner ceased to be a member of the Board upon expiration of his 20-month term as President, ...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Caste Certificate — Limited Scope of Inquiry Under Section 4(1) of Maharashtra Caste Certificate Act. Prima Facie Evidence Sufficient for Issuance of Scheduled Tribe Certificate; Appellate Authority Cannot...