Search Results for "additional material"

14628 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 14628 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru considers batch of income tax appeals under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 challenging ITAT orders for assessment years 2001-02 to 2004-05. Assessee and Revenue both seek to set aside the ITAT decisions and frame substantial questions of law.

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru dealt with a batch of income tax appeals filed under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The appeals a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partly Allows Accused Appeals in MCOC Extortion Case Due to Defective Charge and Excessive Sentence. Conviction under Sections 364, 386 read with 120B IPC and Section 3(1)(ii) MCOC Act upheld; Arms Act and Section 3(4) MCOC convictions set aside and sentence reduced.

The case arose from an extortion incident in Mumbai where a travel business owner was abducted and forced to pay a ransom of Rs.5 lakh. Accused person...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State to Enhance Royalty/Dead Rent in Mining Leases Despite Absence of Express Clause. Statutory Provisions Under Section 15(3) of MMDR Act and Rules 10 and 21 of Punjab Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1964 Impliedly Authorize Enhancement During Subsistence of Lease.

The Supreme Court considered two civil appeals arising from Special Leave Petitions filed by the State of Haryana against judgments of the Punjab and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Writ Petition Against Labour Court Orders Denying Approval of Dismissal. Employer Challenges Findings on Fairness of Domestic Enquiry and Seeks Approval under Section 33(2)(b) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The writ petition arose from an employer's challenge to two orders of the Labour Court which had refused to approve the dismissal of a workman under S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Section 34 Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award for Jurisdictional Excess and Violation of Natural Justice. Petitioner Alleges Arbitrator Entertained Claims Beyond Scope of Reference and Relied on Unproved Certificates, Rendering Award Patently Illegal.

The present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 arose from a construction dispute between Country Club (India) Ltd...