Search Results for "seizure and recovery"

1857 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1857 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Insufficient Circumstantial Evidence and Unproven Extra Judicial Confession. Conviction Under Sections 302 and 201 IPC Set Aside

The High Court allowed the criminal appeal filed by Appellant challenging his conviction for murder under Section 302 IPC and destruction of evidence ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging GST Registration Cancellation Without Notice. Cancellation of registration under Section 29 of CGST Act, 2017 set aside for violation of principles of natural justice as no show-cause notice was issued before cancellation.

The petitioner, Dee Vee Projects Ltd., a public limited company engaged in infrastructure development, was registered under the erstwhile State Sales ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal of Accused in Rape Case Under Sections 342 and 376 IPC. Prosecution Failed to Establish Identity of Accused and Corroborate Testimony of Minor Victim.

The State of Maharashtra challenged the acquittal of Ravindra Kashinath Ghodke by the First Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Jalgaon, in Sessions Case...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant in Murder Case Based on Credible Witness Testimony. Acquittal of Co-Accused Upheld for Lack of Overt Act Under Sections 302, 452, 149 IPC.

The case arises from an incident on 28.03.2008 at about 11:00 p.m., where three accused persons, including appellant Murli Maniram Dhurve (accused no....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Sections 302 and 201 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove chain of circumstances.

The appellant, Ashok Dhondiram Dhavale, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Raigad-Alibag for the murder of Leelabai and her daughter Manisha under S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Motive. Appellants convicted under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC for murder of Mayadi Sohaiya Konar, relying on last seen evidence, motive, and recovery of weapons.

The case pertains to the murder of Mayadi Sohaiya Konar (deceased) on 21st February 2002 at about 9:30 am. The appellants, Subramani Mandar Konar and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Public Servant in Corruption Case for Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Appellant convicted under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 for demanding and accepting Rs. 500 as illegal gratification for processing a grant application.

The appellant, Manoj Shankar Deshpande, a public servant working as an Assistant in the Fisheries Department, was convicted by the Special Judge, Pune...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Murder and Causing Disappearance of Evidence Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Last seen theory and recovery of dead body from appellant's flat held sufficient to prove guilt under Section 302 IPC.

The appellant, Sachin @ Aditya Janardan Kamble, was convicted by the 1st Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge for Greater Mumbai at Dindoshi on 24th Decem...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction Under Section 304 Part II IPC for Causing Death by Rash Act, Reduces Sentence to Period Already Undergone. Appellant's Sentence Reduced as He Was Young and Had Already Served Long Incarceration Period.

The appellant, Gaffar Khan, was convicted by the trial court for the offence punishable under Section 304 Part II of the Indian Penal Code and sentenc...