Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction Under Section 304 Part II IPC for Causing Death by Rash Act, Reduces Sentence to Period Already Undergone. Appellant's Sentence Reduced as He Was Young and Had Already Served Long Incarceration Period.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Accused
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Gaffar Khan, was convicted by the trial court for the offence punishable under Section 304 Part II of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for five years and a fine of Rs. 1000. The incident occurred on 16/10/1992 when the deceased Vasant and the appellant had a quarrel at Nerpingali bus stop, after which they proceeded towards Legaon fata in an autorickshaw driven by Vasant. Another autorickshaw followed with Imran, Rafiq, and 2-3 other persons. A quarrel ensued and the deceased was assaulted with a sharp-edged weapon. The deceased was taken to the hospital where he was declared dead. The appellant was arrested on 17/10/1992. The trial court convicted the appellant under Section 304 Part II IPC. The appellant appealed against the conviction and sentence. The High Court examined the evidence and found that the appellant had caused the death of the deceased but the act did not amount to murder, falling under culpable homicide not amounting to murder. The court upheld the conviction but considered that the appellant was young and had already undergone a long period of incarceration. The court reduced the sentence to the period already undergone, noting that the appellant had been in custody for about 10 years. The court also maintained the fine amount.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Culpable Homicide not amounting to Murder - Section 304 Part II Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Conviction for causing death by rash and negligent act - Appellant convicted for offence under Section 304 Part II IPC for causing death of deceased during a quarrel - Court upheld conviction but reduced sentence to period already undergone considering appellant's young age and long period of incarceration - Held that sentence of five years rigorous imprisonment was excessive and modified to period already undergone (Paras 1-10).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the conviction under Section 304 Part II IPC is sustainable and whether the sentence of five years rigorous imprisonment is appropriate

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal partly allowed. Conviction under Section 304 Part II IPC upheld. Sentence reduced to period already undergone. Fine maintained.

Law Points

  • Culpable homicide not amounting to murder
  • Section 304 Part II IPC
  • Rash and negligent act
  • Sentence reduction
  • Period of incarceration already undergone
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2017 LawText (BOM) (07) 178

Criminal Appeal No. 265 of 2001

2017-07-11

V. M. Deshpande

Shri M.R.Khan for appellant, Shri N.B.Jawade, A.P.P. for State

Gaffar Khan S/o Rashid Khan

State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against conviction and sentence under Section 304 Part II IPC

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought acquittal or reduction of sentence

Filing Reason

Appellant was convicted for causing death of deceased by rash and negligent act

Previous Decisions

Trial court convicted appellant under Section 304 Part II IPC and sentenced to five years RI and fine

Issues

Whether the conviction under Section 304 Part II IPC is sustainable Whether the sentence of five years rigorous imprisonment is appropriate

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the conviction was not sustainable and sentence was excessive State argued that the conviction was correct and sentence was appropriate

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the appellant caused the death of the deceased but the act did not amount to murder, falling under Section 304 Part II IPC. Considering the appellant's young age and long period of incarceration, the sentence was reduced to the period already undergone.

Judgment Excerpts

By the present appeal, the appellant who stands convicted for the offence punishable under Section 304 Part II of Indian Penal Code is sentenced to suffer R.I. for five years and to pay fine of Rs. 1000/ and in default of payment of fine to suffer further R.I. for four months, is before this Court. The report(Exh.43) was reduced into writing by Ravindra(PW12) himself.

Procedural History

FIR lodged on 16/10/1992. Appellant arrested on 17/10/1992. Trial court convicted appellant under Section 304 Part II IPC. Appellant filed appeal in High Court. High Court delivered judgment on 11/07/2017.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 304 Part II, 302, 34
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction Under Section 304 Part II IPC for Causing Death by Rash Act, Reduces Sentence to Period Already Undergone. Appellant's Sentence Reduced as He Was Young and Had Already Served Long Incarceration Period.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals Against Air Force School Not Being 'State' Under Article 12. Writ Jurisdiction Under Article 226 Not Available Against Air Force School Managed by Non-Government Society Funded by Non-Public Funds.