Search Results for "bombay tenancy act"

1827 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1827 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Appellate Order in Tenancy Dispute — Sub Divisional Officer's Order Set Aside as Without Jurisdiction and Perverse. Adoption Claim Not Proved, Sale Deed Upheld.

The petitioner, claiming to be the adopted son of Dhansingrao, filed a suit in 1972 seeking a declaration that a sale deed executed by his adoptive fa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Possession Claim by Lessee in Company Liquidation — Official Liquidator Directed to Hand Over Property Subject to Lease. Leasehold Rights Survive Winding Up and Official Liquidator Must Respect Lessee's Right to Possession Under Section 456 of Companies Act, 1956.

The Provident Investment Company Ltd., a Government of Madhya Pradesh undertaking, filed an application seeking possession of leasehold land admeasuri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Reference to Arbitration in Derivative Action Under Arbitration and Conciliation Act. Section 45 Does Not Require Reciprocity of Territory; Disputes Under Buyback Agreement Without Arbitration Clause Covered by Related Agreements' Arbitration Clauses.

The case pertained to a Notice of Motion under Section 45 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 filed by Defendant Nos. 1 and 2 in a suit brou...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Potentiality of Land for Non-Agricultural Use Considered Despite Restrictions Under Goa Land Use Act. Deduction of 50% from Sale Price of Unrestricted Land Accepted as Basis for Compensation.

The appellant, Shri Pandhari D'Souza Kuttikar, filed an appeal against the judgment and award dated 30.05.2006 passed by the Reference Court, which re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Central Excise Appeal — No Power to Review Under Section 35G of Central Excise Act, 1944. Section 35L of the Act Bars Application of CPC Provisions on Review, Hence Review Petition Not Maintainable.

The petitioner, VIP Industries Ltd., filed a review petition before the Bombay High Court seeking review of an earlier order that dismissed its applic...