Search Results for "Material effect"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...

Search Results for "Material effect"

13962 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 13962 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows ESIC Appeal in Contribution Recovery Case — Limitation Period Under Section 77(1-A) of ESI Act Applies Only to Proceedings Before ESI Court, Not to Recovery Proceedings. The five-year limitation under proviso to Section 77(1-A)(b) does not bar the Corporation's claim for contribution for the period 1977-1996 when made before the ESI Court.

15 Jul 2015

The Employees' State Insurance Corporation (ESIC) filed an appeal under Section 82 of the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948, challenging the judgme...

High Court

WRIT PETITION NO. 482 OF 2015

22 Jul 2016

...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Pension Counting for Part-Time Village Assistant Service - 50% of Pre-Regularisation Service to Be Included Under G.O. Ms. No. 33 and Supreme Court Order. The court held that the benefit of counting 50% of service rendered as part-time Village Assistant prior to regularisation is applicable to all similarly situated Village Assistants for pensionary benefits.

6 Apr 2026

The writ petition was filed by A. Elangovan, a former Village Assistant, seeking a mandamus to direct the respondents (State of Tamil Nadu and revenue...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging SARFAESI Proceedings Against Guarantors — Personal Guarantee Not a 'Right or Interest in Property' Under Section 17(1) of SARFAESI Act, 2002. Guarantors Cannot Challenge Possession Notice Before Debt Recovery Tribunal Under SARFAESI; Remedy Lies Under RDDB Act, 1993.

10 Mar 2017

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by Mahindra Chandrasen and Sharad Chandrasen (petitioners) against Union Bank of India and other respon...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows PIL Against APMC for Illegal Construction Without Development Permission Under MRTP Act. Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee Not a Local Authority Under Section 2(15) of MRTP Act, Hence Not Exempt from Section 44.

3 Aug 2017

This Public Interest Litigation was filed by Goroba Pandurang Gadekar against the State of Maharashtra, Latur Municipal Corporation, Agricultural Prod...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Transfer Order as Violative of Service Rules and Natural Justice. Transfer of Regional Manager to Mumbai set aside for non-compliance with Section 25 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and breach of principles of natural justice.

28 Nov 2018

The petitioner, Ramesh Janardhan Meshram, a retired Regional Manager of Lokshahir Annabhau Sathe Development Corporation, challenged his transfer orde...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court examines legality of appointing persons with criminal background as Ministers. Interpretation of Articles 75 and 164 of the Constitution to uphold democratic integrity and combat criminalisation of politics.

1 Aug 2026

The present writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution was filed as a public interest litigation by the petitioner, Manoj Narula, challenging ...

High Court

Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, Considers Election Petition Alleging Improper Rejection of Nomination Under Section 9A of Representation of the People Act, 1951. Petitioner Claims Retirement from Partnership Firm Removed Disqualification Before Scrutiny Date.

5 Apr 2018

The petitioner, a former partner in M/s. Musale Construction, intended to contest the 2014 Maharashtra Legislative Assembly election from 49-Saoner co...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows State's Appeal and Dismisses Writ Petition Due to Inordinate Delay of 21 Years. The Division Bench held that a writ petition seeking enforcement of a Government Order dated 1992 was not maintainable after such a long delay, despite the petitioner company's lawful succession through amalgamation.

14 Feb 2020

The dispute arose from a writ petition filed by M/s. Anand Investment Private Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, seeking a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Writ Petition Against IGST Demand of Rs.1524 Crores on Arbitration Award Damages. Issue Pertains to Whether Damages Paid Under Deemed Decree Constitute Consideration for Taxable Service Under IGST Act, 2017.

30 Apr 2026

The dispute centers on a writ petition filed by Tata Sons Private Limited (Tata) under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, challenging an intima...

103 104 105 106 107

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)