Search Results for "Bombay Civil Service Rules"

5391 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 5391 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Challenge to Forest Notification as Ultra Vires the Constitution and Forest Laws — Mining Companies Allege Notification Violates Article 246 and Entry 54 of Union List, Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 and Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980

The matter involved multiple writ petitions filed before the High Court of Karnataka by several mining corporations and mineral industries, including ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Batch of Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Notification on Mining Leases; Examines Legislative Competence under Karnataka Forest Act and Forest (Conservation) Act.

A batch of writ petitions was filed before the High Court of Karnataka challenging the validity of Notification No. FEE/23/2007-08 dated 16.08.2008 is...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010479002008_1

The High Court of Karnataka, Bengaluru, heard a consolidated batch of writ petitions filed by various entities including National Mineral Development ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Allows Wife's Maintenance Claim and Enhances Son's Maintenance in Section 125 CrPC Case — Family Court Erred in Denying Maintenance to Wife Based on Earning Capacity Alone; Son's Maintenance Enhanced from Rs.500 to Rs.1,500 Per Month.

The revision petition was filed by the wife and minor son against the order dated 14.10.2010 passed by the Judge, Family Court, Belgaum in Criminal Mi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Condition of Security for Vacating Arrest of Cargo in Admiralty Suit - Cargo Owner Not Liable for Demurrage and Port Charges as They Are Not Party to Contract of Carriage

The appellant, Best Food International Pvt. Ltd., filed an appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against an order dated 4th February 2010 passe...