Search Results for "Arbitral Tribunal Jurisdiction"

1565 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1565 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging CLB Order Refusing Reference to Arbitration. Availability of Alternative Remedy Under Section 10F of Companies Act, 1956 Precludes Exercise of Writ Jurisdiction Under Article 226 of Constitution.

The petitioners, Emgee Housing Private Limited and others, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act, Sets Aside Rejection of Section 8 Application. Development Agreement Contains Valid Arbitration Clause, Disputes Must Be Referred to Arbitration.

The Appellant, Om Swayambhu Siddhivinayak, filed an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an order dated ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bank's Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Counter Guarantee Dispute. Claim Barred by Limitation and Failure to Prove Invocation of Guarantee.

The petitioner, Punjab and Maharashtra Co-op. Bank Ltd., filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act Against Order Refusing Interim Relief in Development Agreement Dispute. Court Upholds Trial Court's Discretion in Refusing Injunction Where Balance of Convenience Favored Status Quo and No Irreparable Loss Was Shown.

The appellant, Villa Realcon LLP, filed an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an order dated September...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Aakash Educational Services Limited Challenging Arbitral Award — Court Upholds Arbitral Tribunal's Findings on Factual Issues and Contract Interpretation Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Aakash Educational Services Limited, filed two writ petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challengi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Restores Arbitral Award in Coal Supply Dispute, Upholds Plausible Contract Interpretation. High Court Exceeded Section 37 Jurisdiction by Substituting Its Own Construction of Coal Mining and Delivery Agreement.

The dispute arose from a Coal Mining and Delivery Agreement (CMDA) executed on 16.07.2008 between Parsa Kente Collieries Limited (appellant) and Rajas...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Insurer's Appeal, Upholds Appointment of Arbitrator in Insurance Claim Dispute. Discharge Voucher Signed Under Protest and Coercion Does Not Bar Arbitration Under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The case involves an appeal by The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. against a Bombay High Court order appointing an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the A...