Search Results for "exception period six years"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "exception period six years"

1701 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1701 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition Challenging Disqualification of Cooperative Society Office Bearers Under Section 75(5) of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960. Core Issue Involves Interpretation of Mandatory Time Limit for Convening Adjourned Annual General Body Meeting Under Rule 60 of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Rules, 1961.

21 Oct 2021

The litigation arose from disqualification proceedings under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 against two office bearers of Navratna CH...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Pune Municipal Corporation's Revision Against Land Acquisition Compensation Enhancement. Reference Court's enhancement of compensation upheld as based on evidence and within its jurisdiction under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

30 Nov -0001

The Pune Municipal Corporation filed a Civil Revision Application under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the judgment and...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Whether Removal of Driver Under Maharashtra Zilla Parishad Rules Based Solely on Conviction for Incident Outside Service Violates Principles of Natural Justice and Proportionality. The Court found that disciplinary authority must consider circumstances and that conduct leading to conviction must constitute misconduct under service rules, not merely a conviction, to warrant removal.

28 Aug 2012

The writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution was filed by the legal heirs of deceased employee Champalal Paliwal against the order of remov...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Against Rejection of Additional Evidence in NI Act Case — Settlement Agreement After Trial Held Relevant. The appellate court must consider subsequent events that affect the merits of the case under Section 391 CrPC, even if the evidence could have been produced earlier with due diligence.

22 Nov 2019

The applicant, Ranjan Dutta, was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, by the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Pune, f...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bayer's Challenge to Compulsory License for Nexavar Under Section 84 of Patents Act, 1970. Court Holds That Patentee's Import of Drug at High Price Does Not Satisfy Reasonable Requirements of Public or Constitute Working of Invention in India.

15 Jul 2014

The petitioner, Bayer Corporation, a US-based pharmaceutical company, held a patent for the drug Sorafenib Tosylate, sold under the brand name Nexavar...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows University's Appeal in Delay Condonation Case — Sets Aside High Court Order, Directs Hearing on Merits. Delay of 916 days in filing LPA condoned as University's decision-making process involving Executive Council and expert committees constituted sufficient cause under Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963.

17 Dec 2019

The Supreme Court of India heard appeals by the University of Delhi against a common judgment of the Delhi High Court dated 29.10.2018, which declined...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Recovery of Alleged Excess Payments from D.Ed College Employees — Recovery Without Notice Violates Principles of Natural Justice. Refixation of Pay Scale and Grade Pay Set Aside as Unilateral and Without Opportunity of Hearing.

16 Apr 2018

The judgment concerns a group of nine writ petitions filed by employees of D.Ed colleges in Maharashtra, challenging the recovery of amounts allegedly...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Parole Eligibility Rule in Negotiable Instruments Act Case. Rule 14 of Maharashtra Prisons (Furlough and Parole) Rules, 2024 requiring one year actual imprisonment for parole eligibility held valid; petitioner convicted under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 not entitled to parole before completing one year.

4 May 2026

The petitioner, Vinodkumar Chellappan Pillai, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court, Circu...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Government Order Appointing Administrator for Vyasaraja Mutt. Petitioners Allege That the Karnataka Hindu Religious Institutions and Charitable Endowments Act, 1997 Does Not Apply to the Mutt and Seek Quashing of the Administrator's Appointment.

2 Jan 2013

The case involved two writ petitions filed in the High Court of Karnataka challenging the Government orders dated 26.05.2012 appointing an administrat...

High Court

Bombay High Court Reviews Preventive Detention Under COFEPOSA Act for Alleged Smuggling of Red Sanders. Questions Raised Over Violation of Right to Equal Representation and Proper Subjective Satisfaction.

24 Aug 2012

The petition was filed by the wife of the detenu Ajit Bapu Satam, challenging his preventive detention under the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and ...

101 102 103 104 105

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)