Search Results for "arbitrary scheme"

2763 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2763 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Company in Stamp Duty Adjudication Case — Holds Adjudication Under Section 31 of Bombay Stamp Act, 1958 Final and Binding. Reopening of Adjudication After 20 Years Under Section 53A Is Without Jurisdiction and Barred by Delay.

The petitioner, Hindustan Unilever Ltd., filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court challenging...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Home University Reservation in Technical Courses. Rules 9(3)(c), 9(3)(d) and 13 of Maharashtra Unaided Private Professional Educational Institutions Rules, 2017 held intra vires the Act and not violative of Articles 14, 19(1)(g), 21, 15(4) and 29(2).

The petitioners, eight students from various districts in Maharashtra, filed a writ petition challenging Rules 9(3)(c), 9(3)(d) and 13 of the Maharash...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of ARE-1 Forms as Proof of Export Under Advance Authorisation Scheme. Court Holds That ARE-1 Forms Are Valid Proof of Export Under Paragraph 4.25 of Handbook of Procedures 2009-14 and Quashes Show Cause Notice.

The petitioner, Larsen & Toubro Limited, a company incorporated under the Indian Companies Act, 1913, challenged a Letter dated 1-12-2016 and a Show C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Act Case — Upholds Appointment of Arbitrator Despite Alleged Non-Compliance with Pre-Arbitration Steps. Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 invoked where respondent failed to appoint arbitrator within 30 days of notice.

The appellant, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, and the respondent, a multi-state co-operative society constituted under the Mult...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010822332025_1

The Division Bench of the High Court of Karnataka heard two intra-court writ appeals filed by M/s MP24 Construction Company, the lead member of a cons...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Hears Petitioners Challenging Modifications to Development Control Regulations for Greater Bombay, 1991 Under Section 37 of MRTP Act. Petitioners Allege Amendments Are Not Minor, Ultra Vires, and Violate Right to Clean Environment Under Article 21.

Seven petitioners, all tax payers and rate-payers of the State of Maharashtra and the Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay, filed a writ petition u...