Search Results for "Civil Jurisdiction"

22013 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 22013 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of Caveat in Execution Proceedings — Caveat Under Section 148A CPC Not Maintainable After Execution Application Is Filed. Court Holds That Assignee Decree-Holder Can Execute Decree Without Notice to Judgment-Debtor Under Order 21 Rule 16 CPC.

The petitioners, who are judgment-debtors in a pending execution application, filed a caveat under Section 148A of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Municipal Corporation in Solid Waste Project Injunction Case — Environmental Claims Lacked Scientific Evidence. Court Restores Trial Court's Dismissal of Suit, Holding That Civil Courts Cannot Restrain Statutory Projects Based on Unsubstantiated Apprehensions.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal of Ratnagiri Nagar Parishad against the judgment of the Bombay High Court which had affirmed the decree of perman...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application to Strike Off Defence in Foreign Award Enforcement Proceedings. Security Deposit Condition Not a Bar to Defend Petition on Merits Under Order 39 Rule 11 CPC and Section 49 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioners, Pacific Basin Handymax (UK) Ltd., filed a Notice of Motion under Order 39 Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking to st...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Service Matter — Appellant Institution Succeeds in Proving Lack of Employer-Employee Relationship. The respondent failed to establish his employment with the appellant, leading to dismissal of the suit for declaration and injunction.

The appellant, The Chairman The State Government Employees Shikshana Sangha, Laxmi Complex, Neeligin Road, Hubli, represented by its Principal, filed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Examines Jurisdictional Challenge to Transfer Pricing Adjustment on Equity Share Issuance. Whether Alleged Shortfall in Premium Constitutes Income from International Transaction Under Chapter X of Income Tax Act, 1961.

Vodafone India Services Pvt. Ltd. (the Petitioner), a wholly owned subsidiary of a non-resident holding company, required funds for its telecommunicat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition Challenging Taxation of Alleged Shortfall in Share Premium Under Transfer Pricing Provisions. The Dispute Centers on Whether Chapter X of the Income Tax Act, 1961 Can Apply When No Actual Income Arises from the International Transaction.

The petitioner, Vodafone India Services Pvt. Ltd., a wholly owned subsidiary of a non-resident holding company, issued 2,89,224 equity shares at a pre...