Search Results for "disputed correspondence"

1216 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1216 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Arbitrator's Interim Order in Coal Transport Contract Dispute. Arbitrator's findings on committee report and weighment system held to be interim and not subject to writ jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution of India.

The petitioner, M/s. Sanwal Coal Carriers, a proprietary concern, entered into a contract with Western Coalfields Limited (respondents) for driving pa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Relief Under Section 9 of Arbitration Act for Enforcement of Consent Award Despite Jurisdictional Challenge. The court held that a party who consents to arbitration without objecting to jurisdiction cannot later challenge the award as a nullity on territorial grounds.

The petitioner, United Spirits Limited, filed an application under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking interim reliefs pe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Challenge to Settlement Commission Order in Customs Duty Case. Settlement Commission's order upheld as valid exercise of power under Section 127H of Customs Act, 1962 granting immunity from interest.

The Union of India, through the Commissioner of Customs, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses State's Appeal in Loan Allotment Dispute — Negligence of State Bank of India as Agent Attributed to Principal State. State Government Held Vicariously Liable for SBI's Failure to Timely Communicate Loan Application, Resulting in Denial of Allotment to Applicant Bank.

The Government of Goa appealed against a judgment and decree dated 12th January 2006 passed by the 1st Ad-hoc Additional District Judge, Panaji, which...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Counter Claim in Specific Performance Suit. Counter Claim Filed Within Limitation Period as Cause of Action Arose from Termination of Agreement and Filing of Suit.

The appeal arose from an order of a Learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court dated 24 November 2006, which allowed a motion for rejection of a co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Borrower's Challenge to DRAT Order in SARFAESI Act Possession Dispute — Possession Notice Valid but Sale Notice Invalid. Bank Permitted to Proceed from Stage of Rule 8(5) of Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002.

The petitioners, M/s. Clarity Gold Pvt. Ltd. (borrower) and Mrs. Ganga Devi Gupta (guarantor and mortgagor), challenged an order of the Debts Recovery...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition of Workmen Seeking Absorption in Western Coalfields Limited — Canteen Workers Not Entitled to Direct Absorption as Contractor Was Not a Sham and Contract Labour Was Not Prohibited Under the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1947.

The petitioner, a trade union representing workmen of Taroda Opencast Mine of Western Coalfields Limited, challenged an award of the Central Governmen...