Search Results for "Safeguard Duty"

1241 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1241 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Sets Aside Anticipatory Bail in Forgery and Cheating Case Involving Forged Sale Deed of Senior Citizens' Land. Court Holds That Anticipatory Bail Cannot Be Granted as a Matter of Routine When Prima Facie Case of Serious Economic Offences Involving Forgery of Documents Is Made Out.

The case involves an appeal by Pratibha Manchanda and another (the appellants) against the State of Haryana and another (respondents) challenging the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 52A and Unreliable Evidence. Conviction under Section 8(b) read with Section 15(c) of NDPS Act set aside as prosecution failed to prove contraband identity and sampling procedure.

The appellant, Mangilal, was convicted under Section 8(b) read with Section 15(c) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Ac...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Consumer Commission Order Directing Builder to Refund Amount with Interest in Flat Possession Delay Case. Builder's Appeal Dismissed as Subsequent Purchaser Entitled to Interest from Deposit Dates Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Despite Force Majeure Claims.

The dispute arose from a consumer complaint filed by the purchaser against the builder for delayed possession of a residential flat. The original allo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Order Quashing State Circulars on Temple Land Records in M.P. Land Revenue Code Dispute. Executive Instructions Found Invalid as They Sought to Override Statutory Bhumiswami Rights of Pujaris Protected Under Sections 57 and 158 of M.P. Land Revenue Code, 1959.

The dispute arose from circulars issued by the State of Madhya Pradesh in 1994 and 2008 directing deletion of Pujari names from revenue records to pre...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Refers to Three-Judge Bench the Question Whether Quantity of Mixture or Pure Drug Content Determines Punishment Under NDPS Act. The Court Held That E. Micheal Raj Requires Reconsideration as It Omitted Note 2 of Notification and the Scheme of the Act Treating Preparations as a Whole.

The Supreme Court, in a reference arising from multiple appeals and writ petitions, considered the correctness of the decision in E. Micheal Raj v. In...