Search Results for "possession and enjoyment"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "possession and enjoyment"

1350 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1350 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Compromise Decree in Civil Suit Due to Fraud and Non-Compliance with Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC — Suit Restored for Hearing on Merits. The court held that a compromise decree obtained without a written and signed compromise and without the court recording satisfaction about its lawfulness is illegal and liable to be set aside under Order XXIII Rule 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

9 Jun 2015

The petitioner, Kasturevva, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at Dharwa...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Interim Status Quo Order in Second Appeal for Non-Compliance with Section 100 CPC. High Court Cannot Grant Interim Relief Without First Formulating Substantial Question of Law.

1 Jan 2025

The Supreme Court considered an appeal against an interim order dated 20.09.2024 passed by the High Court of Andhra Pradesh in a second appeal. The di...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Interpretation of Lease Deed in State of Bihar v. Tata Iron & Steel Co. Ltd. — Interest on Arrears of Rent Calculated on Lump Sum Basis, Not Per Annum, Under Clause (xii) of Lease Deed. The Court held that the absence of the words 'per annum' in Clause (xii) of the Lease Deed was deliberate and the demand for interest on a yearly basis was illegal.

9 May 2019

The case involves a dispute between the State of Bihar (now Jharkhand) and Tata Iron & Steel Co. Ltd. regarding the calculation of interest on arrears...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Second Appeal in Recovery of Possession Case — Sale Deed Valid Despite Non-Execution of Rental Agreement. Plaintiff's title established through registered sale deed and possession handed over; defendant's denial of tenancy does not negate ownership.

29 Jan 2025

The plaintiff (since deceased, represented by legal heirs) filed a suit for recovery of possession and arrears of rent against the defendant. The plai...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Karnataka Land Reforms Case — Restores Land Tribunal's Grant of Occupancy Rights Over Punja Land. The Court held that the High Court erred in setting aside the Tribunal's findings of fact regarding possession and cultivation as on the appointed date.

23 Apr 2019

The case involves a dispute over occupancy rights under the Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961. The appellant's predecessor, Bona Menezes, claimed tenan...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Mundkar Property Dispute — Civil Court Lacks Jurisdiction Over Mundkar Status Under Section 31(2) of Goa Daman and Diu Mundkar (Protection from Eviction) Act, 1975. Mandatory Injunction for Demolition Set Aside as Suit Partly Barred by Limitation.

20 Jan 2006

The case involves a Second Appeal filed by the defendants against the judgment and decree of the lower appellate court in a suit for demolition of str...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitioners' Challenge to Trial Court Orders in Suit for Possession. Court upholds refusal to reject plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC and appointment of commissioner under Order XXVI Rule 9 CPC to identify suit property.

26 Aug 2014

The petitioners, S. Ramaiah, S. Siddappa, and S. Nanjappa, claimed to be owners of agricultural lands measuring 7 acres and 10 guntas in Nagarbhavi vi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Possession Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Disturbed. Court holds that no substantial question of law arises when both lower courts have concurrently found that the appellant failed to prove title or adverse possession over the suit property.

8 May 2014

The appellant, Dilipkumar Bherumal Kucheriya, filed a Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) against the judgment ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Sets Aside Arbitrator Appointment Due to Unstamped Lease Deed. Insufficiently Stamped Document Cannot Be Acted Upon Under Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

1 Jan 2020

The present appeal arises from a judgment of the Karnataka High Court appointing an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. Suit for partition dismissed as plaintiff failed to prove joint family property and possession; no substantial question of law arose.

21 Jun 2024

The present second appeal was filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) by the defendant No.1 challenging the judgment and de...

99 100 101 102 103

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)