ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 4 OF 1986
12 Apr 2013The petition filed under sections 30 and 33 of the Arbitration Act, 1940, sought to challenge an interim award and certain directions issued by the so...
Search Results for "arbitral tribunal jurisdiction"
1540 result(s) found
Found 1540 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Partially Sets Aside Arbitration Award Against Guarantors in Cooperative Bank Dispute — Guarantors Not Liable for Enhanced Credit Facility Without Their Consent. Guarantor Liability Cannot Be Extended Beyond Original Guarantee Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
16 Mar 2012The judgment concerns two arbitration petitions filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging a common undated arb...
- 56
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Limitation of Liability Clause in Arbitration Case — Clause 49.5 Bars Damages for Employer Delay. Contractual prohibition on claiming damages for employer-caused delay held valid and enforceable under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
1 Jan 2025The dispute arose from a construction contract between M/s. C & C Constructions Ltd. (appellant) and IRCON International Ltd. (respondent) for buildin...
- 393
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Arbitration Petition Challenging Award Under BSE Byelaws — Unconditional Withdrawal and Limitation Bar Second Reference. Held that withdrawal of first reference without liberty to file fresh application and filing beyond six months from last transaction under Byelaw 252(2) renders second reference not maintainable.
8 Mar 2013The petitioner, Motilal Oswal Securities Ltd., a trading member of the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE), filed an Arbitration Petition under Section 34 of ...
- 114
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Eviction Decree in Rent Act Case — Concurrent Findings of Default in Payment of Rent and Subletting Not Interfered With Under Article 227. The court upheld the eviction decree under Section 15(1) of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999, based on concurrent findings of default and subletting.
23 Mar 2021The petitioners, Tanzeem Shakil Ahmed Siddiqui and Nausheen Shakil Ahmed Siddiqui, filed two writ petitions under Article 227 of the Constitution of I...
- 36
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Section 9 Petition for Interim Relief in Iron Ore Sale Dispute. Petitioner granted injunction restraining respondent from drawing on bank guarantees and ordered to maintain status quo on letter of credit.
12 Jun 2017The petitioner, M/s. Vedanta Limited (formerly Sesa Sterlite Ltd), a company engaged in extraction, sale and export of iron ore, entered into a Master...
- 63
High Court
High Court of Bombay Dismisses Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Upholding Demurrage Claim. Interpretation of Clause 10(v) of Coal Supply Contract as Creating Primary Liability, Not Indemnity, and Binding Effect of Laytime Statement When No Disagreement Raised Within 30 Days Upheld.
21 Dec 2016The dispute arose out of a contract dated 18 September 1999 between Ultratech Cement Ltd. (appellant, formerly Larsen & Toubro Ltd.) and Sunfield Reso...
- 34
High Court
Bombay High Court Hears Arbitration Petition - ONGC Challenges Umpire’s Award Granting Six Days’ Extension in Pipeline Project. Petition contends that the extension was granted in breach of contract clauses 5.9 and 41.8 and without evidence, after rejecting the related claim for cost of repairs.
12 Aug 2014The dispute arose from a contract dated 6 November 1989 between Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Limited (ONGC) as employer and a consortium of foreign...
- 47
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging CLB Order Refusing Reference to Arbitration. Availability of Alternative Remedy Under Section 10F of Companies Act, 1956 Precludes Exercise of Writ Jurisdiction Under Article 226 of Constitution.
26 Apr 2016The petitioners, Emgee Housing Private Limited and others, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court ...
- 119
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Insurance Arbitration Limitation Dispute — Exclusion of Time Under Section 14 Limitation Act Granted for Representation After Return of Petition. The Court held that the time spent in bona fide proceedings before a court lacking jurisdiction can be excluded, and the delay in re-presentation beyond the fixed date was not fatal.
3 Oct 2019The appellant insurance company issued a fire insurance policy to the respondent company for Rs.70,00,000. A fire occurred on 23.04.2000. The insurer ...
- 163
