Search Results for "Judicial Review"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Judicial Review"

5385 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 5385 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Review Petitions in Rafale Procurement Case, Corrects Factual Error in Judgment. The Court held that the review petitions did not disclose any error apparent on the face of the record and that the scope of judicial review under Article 32 in procurement matters is limited to examining the decision-making process, pricing, and offsets.

14 Nov 2019

The Supreme Court of India delivered a judgment on a review petition and miscellaneous applications arising from its earlier judgment dated 14.12.2018...

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Review Petitions Against Common Order Upholding Land Acquisition for Inner Ring Road Project — No Error Apparent on Record Found. The court held that review jurisdiction under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC is limited and the applicants failed to demonstrate any manifest error in the original order dismissing writ petitions on the ground of alternative remedy under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

9 Jan 2026

The judgment pertains to a batch of review applications filed against a common order dated 27.04.2023 passed by the Madras High Court in W.P.No.7735 o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Central Excise Appeal — No Power to Review Under Section 35G of Central Excise Act, 1944. Section 35L of the Act Bars Application of CPC Provisions on Review, Hence Review Petition Not Maintainable.

16 Dec 2010

The petitioner, VIP Industries Ltd., filed a review petition before the Bombay High Court seeking review of an earlier order that dismissed its applic...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal Has No Power to Review Its Own Orders Under Bombay Tenancy Act. The Tribunal's review jurisdiction under Section 315(1) of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 is not available for orders passed under Section 76 of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948.

20 Oct 2006

The case involved a reference to a larger bench of the Bombay High Court to determine whether the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal has jurisdiction to rev...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Caste Scrutiny Committee’s Review Orders, Holds No Power to Review Once Caste Validity Certificate Issued. The Committee, Being a Statutory Body Under the Maharashtra Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, De-notified Tribes (Vimukta Jatis), Nomadic Tribes, Other Backward Classes and Special Backward Category (Regulation of Issuance and Verification of) Caste Certificate Act, 2000, Lacks Jurisdiction to Review Its Own Final Orders Granting Validity.

18 Jun 2026

These four writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India were directed against orders passed by the Caste Scrutiny Committee, Pune, by...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Review Application in Second Appeal Review Due to Failure to Frame Substantial Question of Law. Court Found That Admission and Disposal of Second Appeal Without Framing Substantial Question of Law Under Section 100 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 Constituted an Error Apparent on the Face of the Record.

17 Sep 2021

The litigation arose from a suit for declaration of ownership based on oral partition, possession, and ancillary reliefs. The trial court decided the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Reporting Trustee in Charity Trust Dispute — Deputy Charity Commissioner Has Power of Review Under Section 22 of Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950. The court held that the Deputy Charity Commissioner, while holding an enquiry under Section 22, exercises powers of a civil court and can review its orders under Order XLVII CPC by virtue of Section 73 of the Act and Rule 7 of the Rules.

4 Jan 2020

The petitioner, Saroj Ashok Sontakke, is the reporting trustee of a public trust registered under the Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950. She filed C...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Review Petitions in Land Acquisition Compensation Case - No Error Apparent on Record Found. Review jurisdiction limited to error apparent on record; compensation at Rs.120 per square yard upheld.

8 Dec 2021

The Supreme Court of India, exercising its inherent jurisdiction, considered multiple review petitions filed against its earlier judgment in Civil App...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Decision Setting Aside Bank Employee's Dismissal in Disciplinary Proceedings Due to Perverse Findings and Procedural Unfairness. The Court affirmed that judicial review under Article 226 of the Constitution permits interference when enquiry findings are based on insufficient evidence and procedural lapses cause prejudice, as per precedents on sufficiency of evidence in departmental proceedings.

31 Jan 2022

The dispute involved a bank employee who was dismissed from service following disciplinary proceedings initiated by the bank. The employee, initially ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Arbitration Appointment Case — No Error Apparent on Record. Court holds that review jurisdiction under Section 114 CPC is limited to errors apparent on the face of the record and cannot be used to re-argue the merits of the case.

10 Dec 2025

The petitioner, Sayla Realtors, filed a review petition before the Bombay High Court seeking review of an order dated September 25, 2025. By that orde...

99 100 101 102 103

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)