Search Results for "valuation date"

1798 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1798 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Probate of Will Dated 12 December 1996 in Testamentary Suit — Will Proved to be Genuine and Duly Executed. Court holds that attesting witnesses' testimony and dismissal of caveats establish the will as the last testament of the deceased.

The present Testamentary Suit was filed by the Plaintiffs, who are executors named in the Will dated 12th December 1996 of Yashwantilika Narottamdas D...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Land Losers' Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case Due to Improper Reliance on Government Floor Rates. Market Value Must Be Determined Based on Sale Exemplars Under Section 18 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894, as Small Sale Instances Cannot Be Ignored for Large Tracts.

The dispute arose from the acquisition of lands in Sultanpur, Gurugram, for constructing Express Highway Phase VII under the Land Acquisition Act, 189...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Customs Show Cause Notice for Alleged Misdeclaration of Imported Goods. Court holds that disputed questions of fact regarding valuation and classification cannot be adjudicated in writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

The petitioners, Globotrans Prologistix Pvt. Ltd. and Naim Shaikh, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bom...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Case — Enhances Compensation Rate Based on Comparable Sale Deeds. Market Value Determined at Rs. 25,000 per Acre Under Section 23 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, with 30% Solatium and 12% Additional Interest.

The appellant, Waman s/o Rajaram Gabhane, owned Survey No. 105 admeasuring 4.99 hectares at Mouza Jamb. The State acquired 40 R of this land for exten...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Deficit Stamp Duty Demand — Limitation Period Under Section 32-A(1) of Bombay Stamp Act, 1958 Is Mandatory. Demand for deficit stamp duty and penalty made after 5 years from execution of instrument is without jurisdiction and liable to be quashed.

The petitioner, Meena Shyam Tulsani, purchased a commercial office premises admeasuring 351 sq.ft super built up area in 1999 through a notarized agre...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Amendment of Probate Schedule by Prothonotary. Prothonotary has power to allow amendment of schedule of assets in probate proceedings under Section 317 of Indian Succession Act, 1925.

The petitioners, Mukesh Ramanlal Gokal and Bharat Ramanlal Gokal, filed a petition under the Testamentary and Intestate Jurisdiction of the Bombay Hig...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Property Tax Pre-Deposit Condition for Appeal Entertainment Under Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act. Pre-deposit under Section 217(2)(d) is mandatory for entertaining appeal, and interim relief cannot be granted without compliance.

The petitioners, Fleet Fastners Private Limited and another, challenged two orders: (1) an order dated 13 July 2011 by the Municipal Corporation of Gr...