Search Results for "regulatory jurisdiction"

1206 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1206 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Negotiable Instruments Act Case — Reverses Acquittal Based on Perverse Findings. Statutory Presumption Under Sections 118(a) and 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Not Rebutted by Accused Despite Admission of Cheque Issuance.

The appellant, Uttam Ram, owned an apple orchard and supplied packing materials to apple growers, including respondent Devinder Singh Hudan. In Septem...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Service Element of Disability Pension for Sailor Discharged After 10 Years in Low Medical Category. Regulation 107 of Navy (Pension) Regulations, 1964 Entitles Personnel with Less Than 15 Years Service to Proportional Service Element.

The case involves an appeal by the Union of India against the order of the Armed Forces Tribunal, Regional Bench, Kochi, which held that the responden...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Rejects Second Bail Application in Economic Offence Case Due to No Change in Circumstances. Applicant's Role as Director in Fraudulent Transactions Upheld; Gravity of Offence Precludes Bail.

The applicant, Waryam Singh Kartar Singh, filed a second bail application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, in connection wit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Forest Notification and Collector's Order Under Maharashtra Private Forest Act. Land Declared as Forest in 1960 Notification Cannot Be Challenged After Decades; Collector's Suo Motu Order Under Section 22(5) Upheld.

The petitioners, claiming to be owners of land in Survey No.245/4B, Kavesar, Thane, challenged an order dated 27 March 2015 passed suo motu by the Dis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rule M-3 of DCPR for Satara Region as Ultra Vires. Rule requiring 12m wide access road for plot subdivision is a valid development control regulation under MRTP Act, 1966 and does not amount to uncompensated acquisition.

The petitioners, Suhas Shridhar Shahane and Subhash Kondiram Sawant, landowners in Satara, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution...