Bombay High Court Quashes Land Acquisition Notifications and Awards for Failure to Conduct Social Impact Assessment and Public Hearing Under RFCTLARR Act, 2013. Non-Compliance with Mandatory Provisions of Sections 4, 11, and 19 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 Renders Acquisition Void Ab Initio.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 160
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Petitioners, Manekbben Rama Tandel and Dharmesh Sukkar Tandel, are owners of land bearing survey Nos. 8, 10/1, 11/2, 11/3 of village Kathiria, Daman, admeasuring 12917 square meters and 4091 square meters. The Respondents issued two preliminary notifications both dated 17th November 2021 under Section 11 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (Act of 2013) for acquisition of the Petitioners' property for expansion of a government hospital. Subsequently, two declarations both dated 14th February 2022 under Section 19 and two Awards both dated 25th April 2022 under Section 23 of the Act were issued. The Petitioners challenged these notifications, declarations, and awards on the ground that the mandatory requirement of conducting a Social Impact Assessment (SIA) under Section 4 of the Act was not complied with. The only SIA conducted was for different survey numbers (19/1, 19/2, 19/5, 19/6, 19/7, 19/8) pursuant to a notification dated 15th February 2019, which did not include the Petitioners' property. No SIA was conducted for the Petitioners' property. Additionally, no public hearing was conducted as required under Section 11 of the Act. The Respondents argued that the SIA report was prepared for the entire area and that the Petitioners' property was included later. The court held that the SIA is a mandatory prerequisite and must be conducted for the specific land proposed to be acquired. Since no SIA was conducted for the Petitioners' property, the preliminary notifications under Section 11 are invalid. Consequently, the declarations under Section 19 and the Awards under Section 23 are also invalid. The court allowed the petition, quashed the impugned notifications, declarations, and awards, and directed the Respondents to pay costs of Rs. 25,000 to the Petitioners.

Headnote

A) Land Acquisition - Social Impact Assessment - Mandatory Requirement - Section 4 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 - The court held that conducting a Social Impact Assessment (SIA) is a mandatory prerequisite before issuing a preliminary notification under Section 11 of the Act. In the present case, no SIA was conducted for the Petitioners' property, and the SIA report relied upon was for different survey numbers. The court held that the acquisition proceedings are void ab initio for non-compliance with Section 4. (Paras 3-10, 20-25)

B) Land Acquisition - Public Hearing - Mandatory Requirement - Section 11 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 - The court held that a public hearing is mandatory before issuing a preliminary notification under Section 11. The Respondents failed to conduct any public hearing for the Petitioners' property. The court held that the preliminary notifications dated 17th November 2021 are invalid. (Paras 11-15, 26-30)

C) Land Acquisition - Declaration under Section 19 - Invalidity - Section 19 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 - Since the preliminary notifications under Section 11 were invalid due to non-compliance with mandatory requirements, the declarations under Section 19 dated 14th February 2022 and the Awards under Section 23 dated 25th April 2022 are also invalid and set aside. (Paras 31-35)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the acquisition proceedings initiated under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 are vitiated due to non-compliance with mandatory requirements of conducting a Social Impact Assessment under Section 4 and a public hearing under Section 11 of the Act.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the petition, quashed the preliminary notifications dated 17th November 2021, declarations dated 14th February 2022, and awards dated 25th April 2022. The Respondents were directed to pay costs of Rs. 25,000 to the Petitioners.

Law Points

  • Mandatory requirement of Social Impact Assessment under Section 4 of RFCTLARR Act
  • 2013
  • Mandatory requirement of public hearing under Section 11 of RFCTLARR Act
  • Non-compliance renders acquisition proceedings void ab initio
  • Preliminary notification under Section 11 must be based on SIA report
  • Declaration under Section 19 must follow valid preliminary notification
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2023 LawText (BOM) (05) 19

Writ Petition No. 2727 of 2022

2023-05-04

R. D. Dhanuka, Gauri Godse

2023:BHC-AS:13676-DB

Mr. T. D. Deshmukh along with Mr. H. D. Chavan, Mr. Sagar Kursija, Ms. S. S. Mohanty for the Petitioner; Mr. H. S. Venegaonkar along with Mr. Aayush Kedia for Respondent Nos. 1 to 4

Manekbben Rama Tandel and Dharmesh Sukkar Tandel

The Collector, Daman; Union territory of Dadra & Nagar Haveli and Daman & Diu; Directorate of Medical Health Services; Public Works Department, Daman

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging land acquisition proceedings under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of preliminary notifications dated 17th November 2021 under Section 11, declarations dated 14th February 2022 under Section 19, and awards dated 25th April 2022 under Section 23 of the Act of 2013.

Filing Reason

Non-compliance with mandatory requirements of conducting Social Impact Assessment under Section 4 and public hearing under Section 11 of the Act of 2013.

Issues

Whether the acquisition proceedings are vitiated due to failure to conduct a Social Impact Assessment under Section 4 of the Act of 2013? Whether the acquisition proceedings are vitiated due to failure to conduct a public hearing under Section 11 of the Act of 2013?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that no Social Impact Assessment was conducted for their property, and the SIA relied upon was for different survey numbers. No public hearing was conducted. Respondents argued that the SIA report was prepared for the entire area and the Petitioners' property was included later, and that the requirements were substantially complied with.

Ratio Decidendi

The requirement of conducting a Social Impact Assessment under Section 4 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 is mandatory and must be conducted for the specific land proposed to be acquired. Failure to conduct SIA and public hearing renders the acquisition proceedings void ab initio.

Judgment Excerpts

The requirement of conducting a Social Impact Assessment under Section 4 of the Act of 2013 is mandatory and a prerequisite for issuing a preliminary notification under Section 11 of the Act. Since no SIA was conducted for the Petitioners' property, the preliminary notifications under Section 11 are invalid. Consequently, the declarations under Section 19 and the Awards under Section 23 are also invalid.

Procedural History

The Petitioners filed Writ Petition No. 2727 of 2022 challenging preliminary notifications dated 17th November 2021. By amendment, they challenged declarations dated 14th February 2022 and awards dated 25th April 2022. The petition was heard on 14th March 2023, 20th April 2023, and 27th April 2023, and judgment was pronounced on 4th May 2023.

Acts & Sections

  • The Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013: 4, 11, 19, 23
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Industrial Plot Allotment Dispute, Upholding Resumption for Non-Compliance with Contractual Terms. The Court Found No Violation of Natural Justice as Multiple Show-Cause Notices Were Issued, and the Allottee Failed t...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru Quashes Planning Authority's Endorsement That Required Free Surrender of Land for National Highway Widening as Condition for Building Plan Approval. Court Rules Section 17(2-B) of Karnataka Town and Country Planni...