Search Results for "arbitrary scheme"

2763 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2763 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Considers Validity of Transit Fee Levy on Forest Produce Under Section 41 of Indian Forest Act, 1927. High Court Judgments on Transit Fee Rules Challenged in Batch of Appeals from Uttarakhand, Uttar Pradesh, and Madhya Pradesh.

This batch of cases before the Supreme Court arose from multiple writ petitions challenging the levy of transit fee on forest produce imposed by the S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Sets Aside Writ Court Order Directing Regularisation of Sweepers Engaged on Daily Wage Basis Without Following Statutory Procedure. Equal Opportunity in Public Employment Mandated by Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution Cannot Be Overridden by Regularising Backdoor Appointments.

The State of Tamil Nadu filed these intra-court appeals under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent challenging the common order dated 22.09.2017 passed by ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Adjudicates Batch of Appeals Involving Transit Fee Levied by Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand and Madhya Pradesh Under Indian Forest Act, 1927. Appeals Arise from Differing High Court Decisions on Validity of Transit Rules Framed Under Section 41.

The Supreme Court addressed a batch of cases concerning the levy of transit fee on forest produce. The matter involved three States: Uttar Pradesh, Ut...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Hears Challenge to Admission Process for Postgraduate Management Courses. Dispute Involves Petitioner's Claim for TypeA Candidature and Challenge to Amendment Removing 15% All India Quota.

The petitioner, a meritorious student with an All India Rank 20 in the CMAT examination, sought admission to the MBA program at the prestigious Jamnal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Considers Petitions by Part-Time Librarians Seeking Full-Time Status Based on Chiplunkar Committee Report. Challenge to Government Resolution dated 3 August 2006 Clauses 1, 3, and 4 as Arbitrary and Contrary to Accepted Recommendations.

The matter before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench comprised a batch of five writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of Indi...