Search Results for "void alienation"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Challenge to Deemed Conveyance in Favor ...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Act Case — Upholds Appointment ...
Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Murder Under Section 302 I...
High Court of Bombay Quashes Deputy Registrar's Directives in Co-operative Socie...

Search Results for "void alienation"

246 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 246 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appellant in Karnataka SC/ST Land Transfer Case Due to Laches and Participation of Original Grantee's Sons in Alienation. The Court held that proceedings under the Karnataka Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prohibition of Transfer of Certain Lands) Act, 1978 must be initiated within a reasonable time, and when the persons who initiated proceedings were parties to the original transfer, the delay is fatal.

7 May 2026

The Supreme Court allowed an appeal against concurrent findings that annulled a sale under the Karnataka Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prohib...

High Court

Madras High Court Grants Injunction Under Section 9 of Arbitration Act to Protect Decree-Holder's Interest Pending Execution. Court Restrains Respondents from Alienating Property Subject to Execution Petition to Prevent Frustration of Arbitral Decree.

27 Feb 2026

The applicant, C.J. Charles Rajkumar, proprietor of M/s Kiruba Constructions, filed an application under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Rent Control Matter — First Appellate Court Exceeded Jurisdiction Under Section 43 Rule 1(u) CPC by Remanding Suit Without Framing Substantial Question of Law. The High Court held that the First Appellate Court cannot reverse a trial court decree and remand the suit without framing a substantial question of law as mandated by Section 43 Rule 1(u) CPC.

17 Jun 2025

The appellant, Mustaf s/o Goususab Halagali @ Holageri, was the defendant in O.S.No.142/2014 filed by the respondent, Gangadhar s/o Channamallappa Jad...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Property Dispute, Reverses High Court's Dismissal of Second Appeal Under Section 100 CPC. The High Court's failure to frame a substantial question of law as required under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, rendered its judgment unsustainable, leading to remand for fresh consideration.

23 Apr 2025

The appeal arose from a property dispute involving cancellation of sale deeds, recovery of possession, and injunction. The appellants, second to fifth...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Civil Revision Petition in Suit for Declaration of Joint Family Property — Plaint Not Liable for Rejection Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC. Daughters and Minor Son's Suit for Declaration of Joint Family Property and Partition is Maintainable Despite Alleged Prior Partition Deed.

7 Mar 2025

The petitioner-defendant No. 3 filed a civil revision petition under Section 115 of CPC challenging the order dated 19.07.2023 passed by the Senior Ci...

Supreme Court

Protecting the Rights of the Appellant: Court Rules Against Bonafide Purchasers in the Doctrine of Lis Pendens Case. Rejection of Defence and Upholding of Decree in a Property Dispute

3 May 2024

The proceedings and judgment of an appeal filed before a court, challenging a judgment and order passed by the Punjab and Haryana High Court on 03.10....

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes High Court's Interim Injunction Order Affecting Third Parties' Property Rights Without Hearing. Interim Injunction Cannot Be Granted Against Persons Claiming Rights in Suit Properties Without Impleading Them as Parties and Providing Opportunity of Hearing Under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

17 Nov 2021

The Supreme Court addressed appeals by third parties aggrieved by an interim injunction order passed by the High Court of Karnataka in a partition sui...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Trial Court's Valuation of Suit for Declaration and Injunction Under Karnataka Court Fee and Suit Valuation Act, 1958 — Suit for Declaration That Sale Deed Is Null and Void Is Properly Valued Under Section 26(c) Read with Section 24(d) of the Act.

24 Apr 2015

The defendant filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 30.7.2013 passed by the I Addit...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal by Defendants, Confirming that Document Dated 05.06.1953 is a Mortgage, Not an Agreement of Sale. The Court Upheld the Concurrent Findings of the Lower Courts that the Transaction was a Loan with Possession of Land as Security, and the Plaintiff was Entitled to Possession.

21 Aug 2013

The respondent/plaintiff filed a suit for declaration that a document dated 05.06.1953, styled as an agreement of sale (Isar Pawati), was actually a m...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Application in Suit for Declaration and Injunction — Plaint Ordered to be Returned for Presentation to Proper Court Due to Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction. The court held that the City Civil Court at Dindoshi lacked jurisdiction over immovable property situated in Kandivali, and the plaint must be returned under Order VII Rule 10 CPC.

10 Oct 2011

The case involves a civil revision application filed by the original defendant no. 4, Manju Narendra Gupta, challenging an order of the City Civil Cou...

8 9 10 11 12

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)