Search Results for "section 351"

452 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 452 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Transfers Investigation to CBI in Police Firing and Caste Abuse Case. Court Finds Police Misconduct and Counter Case Registration Necessitate Impartial Probe Under Article 226 of Constitution of India.

The petitioner, father of the victim Manikandan, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking transfer of investigatio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

State Employee Gratuity Payout Deferred Pending Appeal Conclusion. Court rules that gratuity is payable only after final judicial orders, including appeals, are issued under Maharashtra Civil Services Pension Rules.

This case deals with the entitlement of a State Government employee to receive gratuity upon the conclusion of judicial proceedings under Rule 130(1)(...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Tenant's Appeal Against Demolition Order in MMC Act Case — Failure to Issue Notice to Owner and Lack of Personal Hearing Violates Natural Justice. Tenant in Possession Since Prior to 1987 Entitled to Hearing Before Demolition Under Section 351 of MMC Act.

The appellant, a tenant in possession of premises since prior to 1987, challenged a show cause notice under Section 351 of the Mumbai Municipal Corpor...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal of Injunction in Municipal Demolition Case. Assessment of Property Tax Does Not Confer Legality on Unauthorised Construction Under Section 351 of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888.

The appellant, a tenant of a shop in Mumbai, filed an appeal against an order of the City Civil Court, Mumbai, refusing to grant ad interim injunction...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Appeal Against Demolition Notice Under Section 351 of MMC Act, 1888 — Terrace Room Protected But Three Sheds Not Entitled to Injunction. The court held that balance of convenience and prima facie case did not favour protecting the three sheds from demolition.

The appellant, Abhinandan Commercial Centre Pvt. Ltd., filed an appeal against an order of the City Civil Court dated 13th January 2005, which partly ...