Search Results for "reopening beyond four years"

234 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 234 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Petition Challenging Reopening Notice Under Section 148 for AY 2012-13 as Time-Barred. Notice Issued Beyond Six-Year Limit Under Section 149 After Search Under Section 132 on 08.09.2021.

The petitioner, Manojbhai Bhupatbhai Vadodaria, filed a writ petition challenging a notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for Assessmen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening Notice Under Section 148 of Income-tax Act, 1961 for Lack of Fresh Material — Prior Scrutiny Assessment Cannot Be Reopened on Same Issues Without New Tangible Material

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Power Generation Company Limited, a company engaged in electricity generation for the State of Maharashtra, challeng...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Lack of Fresh Material. Reopening Based on Mere Change of Opinion on Allowability of Sales Promotion and Physician Sample Expenses is Invalid.

The petitioner, Abbott India Limited (successor of Solvay Pharma India Ltd.), challenged a notice dated 27 March 2015 issued under Section 148 of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Reassessment Case — Tribunal's Finding of Full Disclosure Upheld. Reopening Beyond Four Years Invalid as Assessee Disclosed All Material Facts in Return.

The appeal was filed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-28 under section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, challenging the order of the Incom...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Quashes Reopening Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for Lack of Fresh Material and Change of Opinion. Assessment Reopening After Four Years Invalid Without Failure to Disclose True and Full Facts.

The petitioner, M/s. Anand Developers, a partnership firm, challenged a notice dated 29 March 2019 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 196...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner in Income Tax Reopening Case — Notice Under Section 148 Quashed as Beyond Four Years Without Failure to Disclose. Reopening of Assessment Based on Change of Opinion Held Invalid Under Section 147 of Income Tax Act, 1961.

The petitioner, Multiscreen Media Private Limited, a company engaged in providing audiovisual television software, films, events, and related activiti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice in Income Tax Case Due to Lack of Fresh Material Beyond Four Years. Reopening of Assessment Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 Held Invalid as There Was No Failure to Disclose Material Facts and No New Tangible Material.

The petitioner, Multiscreen Media Private Limited, a company engaged in providing audiovisual television software and related activities, filed return...