High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru Hears Public Interest Litigation Regarding Unspecified Government Action. The Case Involves Impleaded Respondents Including State Officials and Karnataka Public Service Commission.
21 Jun 2016...
Search Results for "preliminary decision"
4701 result(s) found
Found 4701 result(s)
High Court
- 63
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Order in Lokayukta Case, Upholds Statutory Power to Direct Preliminary Inquiry by State Agency. The Court Held That Section 20(1) of the Odisha Lokayukta Act, 2014 Permits the Lokayukta to Order a Preliminary Inquiry by Any Agency, Including the Directorate of Vigilance, to Ascertain a Prima Facie Case, and Judicial Interference at This Stage Was Unwarranted.
23 Feb 2023The dispute arose from a complaint dated 9th December 2020 by a Deputy Superintendent of Police alleging corruption against an elected Member of the L...
- 270
High Court
KAHC010022932010_1
11 Jul 2014A batch of writ petitions was filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore, challengi...
- 66
High Court
- 16
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Return of Plaint for Lack of Jurisdiction in Town Planning Dispute — Court Lacks Jurisdiction Under Section 149 of MRTP Act, Need Not Decide Other Issues on Merits. Once Jurisdiction Is Found Absent, Court Becomes Functus Officio and Must Return Plaint Without Adjudicating Other Issues.
15 Dec 2006The case arose from a suit filed by Jagdish Hari Thatte and six others against the Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay and the State of Maharashtr...
- 72
High Court
- 65
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Resolves Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition for 'Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout'. The Petitioners Sought to Quash Preliminary Notification Dated 21.05.2008 and Final Notification Dated 18.02.2010 Issued by Bangalore Development Authority.
11 Jul 2014A large batch of writ petitions came before the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore, filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. T...
- 51
High Court
Bombay High Court Delivers Oral Judgment on Sanction of Scheme of Arrangement Amid BIFR Pendency. Maintainability Under Sections 391 and 394 of Companies Act, 1956 Against Overriding Effect of Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 Considered.
8 Nov 2006The petitioner, Ashok Organics Industries Ltd., incorporated in 1973, filed a petition under Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, seeking ...
- 22
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Suit for Specific Performance and Injunction — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Court holds that a second appeal under Section 100 CPC is not maintainable against concurrent findings of fact unless substantial question of law arises.
12 Mar 2015The appellant, Mr. Jagadish Poonja, filed a Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and decre...
- 120
