Search Results for "notice under Section 25(3)"

354 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 354 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Cognizance Order in Matrimonial Dispute Due to Inordinate Delay and Lack of Explanation — Section 468 CrPC Limitation Bars Prosecution for Offences Under Sections 498A, 494, 506 IPC Alleged After 24 Years.

The petitioner, Mahesh R., filed a criminal petition under Section 482 CrPC seeking to quash the order of cognizance taken by the IV Additional Senior...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Income Tax TDS Case — Liquor Vendors Are Not 'Buyers' Under Section 206C of Income Tax Act, 1961. Court holds that excise contractors acquiring arrack under state-controlled system are excluded from definition of 'buyer' under Explanation (a)(iii) of Section 206C.

The appeal arose from a dispute under Section 206C of the Income Tax Act, 1961, concerning tax collection at source on the sale of alcoholic liquor. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal for Lack of Jurisdiction in Income Tax Case. Appeal Against Bangalore ITAT Order Lies Only Before Karnataka High Court Under Section 260A of Income Tax Act, 1961.

The case involves an appeal filed by the Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax -3, Pune (the Revenue) under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, challen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal for Lack of Jurisdiction in Income Tax Case. Appeal against Bangalore Bench of ITAT lies only before Karnataka High Court under Section 260A of Income Tax Act, 1961.

The case involves an appeal filed by the Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax -3, Pune under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, challenging an order ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition in Customs Act Case — Confiscation and Penalties Quashed for Lack of Mens Rea. Imported capital goods released on payment of duty; no deliberate intent to evade duty established under Sections 111(d), 111(f), 112(a), and 125 of Customs Act, 1962.

The petitioners, M/s. Central Cables Limited (a company manufacturing electric wires and cables), its Managing Director Govind Daga, and Purchase Offi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award — Time Limit in Consent Order Held Directory, Not Mandatory. Arbitrator's Mandate Did Not Terminate Automatically Upon Expiry of Four-Month Period Under Section 14 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The appeal arose from an order of a Single Judge dismissing a petition challenging an arbitral award dated 31.3.2004. The dispute originated from Suit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Loss Deduction for Confiscated Foreign Currency in Income Tax Reference. Foreign currency confiscated by customs authorities under FERA held allowable as business loss under Income Tax Act, 1961, even though treated as undisclosed income.

The case involves an income tax reference by the Revenue against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) for the assessment year 1982-83...