Search Results for "mining policy"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Disposes Appeal by Consent Appointing Arbitrator in MSME Dispute, ...

Search Results for "mining policy"

264 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 264 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows State Appeal in Mining Contract Interest Dispute — Security Deposit Does Not Carry Interest Despite Delayed Refund When Contract Expressly Bars Interest. Clause 19 of Form-L Contract Under Punjab Minor Minerals Concession Rules, 1964 Precludes Interest on Security Deposit, and Section 34 CPC Does Not Apply to Contractual Deposits.

13 Jul 2026

The case involves appeals by the Appellants and its officers against a judgment of the Punjab and Haryana High Court which directed payment of interes...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Directs Protection of Sacred Groves/Orans in Rajasthan as Deemed Forests Under Forest Conservation Act, 1980. Recognizes Ecological and Cultural Significance of Community-Conserved Forests and Balances Community Rights with Conservation Goals.

18 Dec 2024

The Supreme Court of India was hearing an interlocutory application in the ongoing T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad v. Union of India writ petition, which ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging E-Auction for Sand Excavation Without Prior Environmental Clearance. Mandatory Environmental Clearance Under Environment Impact Assessment Notification, 2006 Must Be Obtained Before Issuing E-Auction Notices for Sand Mining.

13 Jan 2022

The petitioner, M/s Jai Gajanan Shri Gajanan Building Material Suppliers, a proprietorship firm engaged in the business of excavation and transportati...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Public Interest Litigation Against Tree-Planting Fund Collection — Cauvery Calling Project Not Found to Be Collecting Funds Illegally or Without Government Oversight. Court Finds No Illegal Fund Collection or Activity on Government Land, Holds State Already Monitoring the Project.

7 Sep 2021

The present writ petition was filed as a public interest litigation under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, by a practicing advocate,...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal by MSEDCL in Electricity Tariff Dispute Over Change in Law Due to Wildlife Notification. Held that the notification declaring buffer zone around Tadoba Tiger Reserve constituted a 'Change in Law' under PPAs, entitling APML to compensatory tariff for all four PPAs.

27 Aug 2021

The present appeals arise from a dispute between Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (MSEDCL), the appellant, and Adani Power M...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses PIL Challenging Construction of Residential Complex in Eco-Sensitive Zone — No Violation of Environmental Norms Found. Court held that construction was permitted under the Regional Plan and that the project had obtained all necessary approvals from the Town and Country Planning Department, Goa State Pollution Control Board, and other authorities.

30 Dec 2020

The judgment concerns a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by four petitioners against the construction of a residential complex in Sirsaim, Goa. ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Pre-Qualification Criteria in Mining Tender for Being Arbitrary and Unreasonable. Condition requiring prior experience in coal washery operation within a specified region held to be discriminatory and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution.

9 Oct 2019

The petitioner, Bhatia Coal Washeries Ltd., challenged the pre-qualification criteria of Tender No. MSMC/MINING/2019/07 dated 16-8-2019 issued by the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Admiralty Suit for Cargo Damage Claim Due to Lack of In Rem Jurisdiction and Limitation Bar. The court held that the vessel was not within Indian territorial waters at the time of suit filing and the claim was time-barred under the one-year limitation period under Article III Rule 6 of the Hague Rules.

28 Aug 2019

The plaintiff, Elecon Engineering Company Limited, filed an admiralty suit in rem against the vessel 'Rickmers Dubai' and other defendants for recover...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Restores Arbitral Award in Coal Supply Dispute, Upholds Plausible Contract Interpretation. High Court Exceeded Section 37 Jurisdiction by Substituting Its Own Construction of Coal Mining and Delivery Agreement.

27 May 2019

The dispute arose from a Coal Mining and Delivery Agreement (CMDA) executed on 16.07.2008 between Parsa Kente Collieries Limited (appellant) and Rajas...

High Court

Bombay High Court Adjudicates PIL and Writ Petitions on Hoarding Permissions on Airport Land. Petitioners Allege Non-Compliance with MMC Act, 1888 Sections 328 and 328A and CRZ Regulations.

1 Mar 2018

A public interest litigation and two writ petitions were filed before the Bombay High Court challenging the erection of hoardings by an advertising co...

8 9 10 11 12

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)