KAHC010479002008_1
3 Dec 2015The High Court of Karnataka, Bengaluru, heard a consolidated batch of writ petitions filed by various entities including National Mineral Development ...
Search Results for "mineral extraction"
133 result(s) found
Found 133 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Considers Whether Notification 14/2010-ST is Clarificatory for Service Tax on Drilling Rigs in Continental Shelf. Appeal Admitted on Questions of Territorial Applicability of Service Tax to Offshore Drilling Services Under Finance Act, 1994.
28 Apr 2015The appellant, M/s. Greatship (India) Ltd., entered into contracts with ONGC in February and May 2009 to provide offshore drilling services using hire...
- 45
High Court
High Court of Bombay Adjudicates Writ Petitions Challenging Desilting Policy Tender Conditions as Arbitrary and Unconstitutional. Petitioners Contend Conditions Violate Articles 14 and 19(1)(g) and Disregard Court's Directive in PIL No.143 of 2012.
18 Mar 2019The High Court of Bombay heard four connected writ petitions challenging certain conditions stipulated in a Government Resolution dated 03.08.2018 iss...
- 44
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging E-Auction of Sand Ghats — Time-Limited Auction Process Upheld as Valid. Court holds that introduction of time limit in e-auction is not arbitrary and that disconnection of internet link does not vitiate auction when petitioner failed to report promptly.
16 Jan 2013The petitioner, Arunodaya Magaswargiya Mazdoor Kamgar Sahakari Sanstha Ltd., a labour cooperative society registered under the Maharashtra Cooperative...
- 121
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Collector's Instructions Prohibiting Transportation of Ready Mix Plaster from Gujarat to Maharashtra. Instructions Based on Gujarat Notification for Sand Held Inapplicable to Ready Mix Plaster, Violating Article 301 of Constitution.
6 Feb 2018The petitioners, Dipak Logistics and Forwarders and Shiv Enterprise, challenged instructions issued by the Collector, Palghar (Respondent No.2) prohib...
- 137
High Court
- 46
High Court
- 52
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petitions of Granite Dealer in VAT/CST Case — No Substantial Question of Law. Assessee failed to prove inter-State stock transfer; Tribunal's concurrent findings of fact upheld under Section 65(1) of KVAT Act, 2003.
6 Jul 2018The petitioner, M/s. Shanthakoti Enterprises, a dealer engaged in extraction and sale of rough granite blocks from quarries in Chamarajanagar, filed r...
- 62
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Defines Aravali Hills and Ranges for Conservation in T.N. Godavarman Case. Court adopts scientific definition based on geological and ecological criteria to prevent desertification and protect biodiversity across Delhi, Haryana, Gujarat, and Rajasthan.
20 Nov 2025The Supreme Court of India, in its inherent jurisdiction under Article 32 of the Constitution, addressed the critical issue of defining 'Aravali Hills...
- 205
