Search Results for "arbitrator substitution"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "arbitrator substitution"

209 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 209 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Sets Aside Arbitral Interim Award in Property Dispute — Challenge Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act Allowed on Grounds of Patent Illegality and Violation of Natural Justice. The court held that the arbitrator's computation of amounts and interest under clause 9 of the Permanent Alternate Accommodation Agreements was patently illegal and contrary to the terms of the contract.

23 Aug 2022

The petitioners, Dhiraj Lakhamashi Shah and another, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging an in...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Petition Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act, 1996, Setting Aside Part of Arbitral Award for Being Contrary to Public Policy. Court holds that arbitrator cannot award interest on interest (compound interest) unless specifically agreed, and that claims barred by limitation cannot be awarded.

29 Jul 2015

The petitioner, Rajesh Pravinchandra Rajyagor, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitra...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Setting Aside of Arbitral Award in Price Escalation Dispute. Interpretation of price escalation clause by arbitral tribunal found patently illegal as it ignored the contractual formula, leading to setting aside of award under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

3 Aug 2022

The case involves a challenge under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 against a judgment dated 31st March 2017 passed by a lear...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Considers Cross Appeals Under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Against Single Judge's Order in Arbitration Petition. Appeals Arise from Setting Aside of Arbitral Award on Multiple Claims Relating to Pipeline Contract, Raising Issues of Judicial Review Under Section 34 and Finality of Engineer-in-Charge Decisions.

8 Aug 2025

These were cross appeals under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay against the orde...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Arbitral Award in Share Dispute — Award Set Aside for Patent Illegality and Violation of Natural Justice. Court held that the Arbitral Tribunal failed to consider crucial evidence and misapplied the law regarding limitation and the scope of arbitration agreement.

28 Nov 2025

The judgment arises from three connected writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an arbitral award passed by a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Cross-Petitions Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act Challenging Arbitral Award in Commercial Dispute; Award Directed Payment of Rs. 96.20 Lakhs Plus Interest and Costs for Non-Delivery of Equipment Under Purchase Order, While Supplier Challenged Deduction for Support Services.

2 Dec 2025

Background: The case involved cross-petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging an arbitral award dated 30 Ma...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Challenge to Arbitrator's Interlocutory Order on Summoning of Documents. Court Considers Maintainability of Writ Petitions Against Interlocutory Orders Under Articles 226 and 227 in Light of SBP & Co. v. Patel Engineering.

16 Mar 2023

The dispute arose between Dodballapur Integrated Textile Park Limited and the claimants, Vinod G. Jain and Premalatha G. Jain, under a sub-lease agree...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Extension of Arbitral Tribunal Mandate in Commercial Arbitration Dispute — Jurisdiction Under Section 29A(4) Lies with Court Defined Under Section 2(1)(e) of Arbitration Act. The court held that the appointing court becomes functus officio after constitution of tribunal and extension is a curial supervision measure, not an appointment.

10 Mar 2026

The applicant, Coimbatore Integrated Waste Management Company Private Limited, is the claimant in an arbitration proceeding. The arbitral tribunal's m...

High Court

Bombay High Court Reserved Judgment on Challenge to Section 84 of Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act, 2002 and Arbitrator's Appointment. Petitioner Challenged Appointment of Single Arbitrator for All Bank Disputes as Violative of Article 14 of the Constitution and Sought Setting Aside of Arbitral Award.

13 Oct 2017

M/s J. Square Steels Pvt. Ltd. (principal borrower) availed credit facilities from Abhyudaya Co-operative Bank Ltd. in 2005 and defaulted, leading to ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Challenge to Arbitral Award on Royalty Reimbursement. Award's Interpretation of 'Any Further Increase' Clause as Covering Royalty Charges Upheld as Reasonable Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

17 Aug 2012

The Maharashtra State Road Development Corporation Ltd. (MSRDC), a Government of Maharashtra undertaking, had awarded a contract for four-laning of a ...

8 9 10 11 12

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)