Search Results for "arbitration services"

674 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 674 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Arbitration Appointment Case — Party Cannot Take Inconsistent Stances. Original Respondent's written commitment to a court-appointed sole arbitrator binds it, and its subsequent objection to the appointment is inequitable conduct.

The Original Respondent (Global Zone Sanitory Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.) filed a Review Petition against an order dated June 20, 2024, appointing a sol...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Arbitrator Appointment in ISRO Contract Dispute Due to Lack of Jurisdiction. Appointment by Delhi Arbitration Centre without consent of Union of India held invalid under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Union of India represented by the Ministry of Space (ISRO), filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of In...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Section 11 Applications in International Commercial Arbitration — Habitual Residence Determined at Time of Agreement. Applicant Residing in UAE at Time of Agreement Held to be Habitually Resident Outside India Under Section 2(1)(f)(i) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The judgment concerns three arbitration applications filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, by Aslam Ismail Khan Deshmu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against High Court Order Appointing Substitute Arbitrator in Contract Dispute. Court Holds That High Court Erred in Terminating Mandate of Arbitrator Appointed by Consent and in Deviating from Arbitration Clause Without Justification.

The appellant, Rajasthan Small Industries Corporation Limited, invited tenders for handling and road transportation of ISO containers and cargo. The r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Enforces Foreign Arbitral Award in Favour of Petitioner in Iron Ore Fines Sale Dispute. Rejects Respondent's Challenge Based on Public Policy and Natural Justice Under Sections 44-49 of Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Noble Resources Ltd., a Hong Kong company, entered into a contract on 9 May 2008 with the respondent, Twenty First Century Wire Roads ...