Search Results for "Tahsildar Office"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "Tahsildar Office"

1096 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1096 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Elected Gram Panchayat Members Challenging No-Confidence Motion — Secret Ballot Election of Sarpanch Upheld Under Rule 10(2) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats (Sarpanch and Upa-Sarpanch) Election Rules, 1964. Court holds that the no-confidence motion was invalid due to lack of proper notice under Section 35 of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959.

5 Jun 2023

The petitioners, elected members of Gram Panchayat Chimbli, challenged the election of Sarpanch and Deputy Sarpanch conducted on 24.02.2021 and a subs...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellants in Robbery Case Under Section 392 IPC. Identification by Witnesses and Recovery of Stolen Property Sufficient to Sustain Conviction.

7 Feb 2019

The judgment concerns two criminal appeals arising from a common conviction under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code for robbery. The appellants, Sh...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellants for Robbery Under Section 392 IPC. Identification by Witnesses and Recovery of Stolen Property Sufficient to Sustain Conviction.

7 Feb 2019

The case involves two criminal appeals arising from a common judgment of conviction dated 24.3.2004 passed by the 1st Ad hoc Additional Sessions Judge...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Sarpanch's Challenge to No Confidence Motion in Gram Panchayat Dispute. Petitioner's removal upheld as meeting complied with procedural requirements under Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1958 and Rules.

21 Jan 2019

The petitioner, Manoj Ghanshyamdas Banode, was the elected Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Talegaon Dashasar. On 05.12.2016, a no confidence motion was pas...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Upholds No-Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch and Up-Sarpanch; Meeting Convened Within Two Days Valid Under 1975 Rules. Special meeting for no-confidence motion under Section 35 of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act and the 1975 Rules does not require three clear days' notice as per Rule 4 of Meetings Rules 1959, and meeting held within seven days is sufficient.

2 Jul 2018

The dispute arose from a no-confidence motion passed against the Sarpanch and Up-Sarpanch of Village Panchayat Kawalgaon, Taluka Degloor, District Nan...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Four Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Motive and Inconsistent Evidence. Conviction under Sections 302, 201 r/w 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

7 Oct 2014

The appellants, four individuals, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Ambajogai for the murder of Ram Baburao Masal under Section 302 IPC...

High Court

High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Sanction and Doubtful Trap — Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Sanction under Section 19 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 not proved; complainant turned hostile; trap witness not independent.

24 Feb 2011

The appellant, Manohar Bodade, was convicted by the Special Judge, Aurangabad in Special Case No. 01/1993 for offences under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) r...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Railway's Challenge to Temporary Injunction in Favour of Educational Society for Use of Approach Road. Court upholds appellate order restraining obstruction of road constructed on shivdhura of survey no. 348 based on Tahsildar's permission and prima facie findings.

12 Mar 2010

The petitioners, officers of the Central Railway, challenged the judgment dated 21/1/2010 of the 4th Additional District Judge, Nagpur in MCA No. 230/...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Levy of Stamp Duty on Mining Lease Deeds — Stamp Duty on Mining Lease Deeds Must Be Computed Under Article 35(a) of Schedule I of the Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958 Based on Average Annual Royalty, Not on Dead Rent or Total Consideration.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioners, who are holders of mining leases for minor minerals in the State of Maharashtra, challenged the levy of stamp duty on their mining le...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Grampanchayat Resolution and Tahsildar's Order in Land Dispute. Court upholds validity of resolution and order, finding no violation of natural justice or statutory provisions.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioners, twelve residents of Sangav, Taluka Kagal, District Kolhapur, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India bef...

8 9 10 11 12

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)