Search Results for "Securitisation"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Securitisation"

417 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 417 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, Considers Multiple Writ Petitions Against Maharashtra State Co-operative Bank's Securitisation Action Over Sugar Factory Assets. The Core Legal Question is Whether a Co-operative Bank Qualifies as a 'Bank' Under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, and the Validity of Measures Taken Under Section 13(4) Thereof.

19 Dec 2006

The matter arose from multiple writ petitions filed before the Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) concerning the assets of Shankar Sahakari Sakhar K...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging DRAT's Pre-Deposit Order Under SARFAESI Act. Pre-deposit of 30% of Amount Due Under Section 18(1) of SARFAESI Act is Mandatory and DRAT Has No Discretion to Waive It.

15 Nov 2011

The petitioner, Shree Vindhya Paper Mills Ltd., challenged an order of the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRAT) dated 4 November 2011, which requir...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bank's Revision Against Trial Court's Jurisdiction Ruling in SARFAESI Act Suit. Civil Court Has Jurisdiction to Entertain Suit for Permanent Injunction Against Re-auction of Mortgaged Property Despite SARFAESI Act Provisions.

16 Apr 2015

The respondent, original plaintiff, filed Regular Civil Suit No.1756 of 2014 seeking a permanent injunction restraining the applicant bank from re-auc...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Plaint in SARFAESI Act Case — Civil Suit Not Barred Under Section 34 When Challenge is to Mortgage Validity and Bank's Actions, Not Recovery Proceedings. The court held that the bar under Section 34 of the SARFAESI Act does not apply to a suit seeking declaration of title and challenging the validity of a mortgage, as such issues are not within the jurisdiction of the Debt Recovery Tribunal.

16 Jul 2021

The appellant, Smt. Nanjamma, filed a civil suit (O.S.No.3780/2017) before the XXII Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru, seeking a dec...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging SARFAESI Auction Sale Due to Alternative Remedy and Suppression of Facts. Petitioner, a Director and Shareholder of Mortgagor Company, Failed to Disclose Rejection of OTS and Auction Sale, Leading to Dismissal with Costs.

17 Oct 2025

The petitioner, Ms. Archana Wani, a director and shareholder of respondent No. 5 (N. Kumar Housing and Infrastructures), filed a writ petition under A...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal by Asset Reconstruction Company Against Borrowers in SARFAESI Act Matter — Upholds Single Judge's Order Quashing Possession Notice Due to Non-Compliance with Section 13(2) and (3A). The Court Held That the Secured Creditor Must Strictly Adhere to the Statutory Procedure Under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 Before Taking Possession.

5 Jun 2024

The appellant, M/s. International Asset Reconstruction Company Limited, a secured creditor, issued a possession notice under the Securitisation and Re...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging SARFAESI Auction Sale Against Personal Guarantors. Alternative Remedy Under Section 17 of SARFAESI Act, 2002 Not Exhausted; Auction Sale Confirmed and Sale Certificate Issued.

25 Jan 2017

The petitioners, M/s Utkarsh Cement Sales Pvt. Ltd. and its directors/guarantors, filed two writ petitions before the Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Be...

High Court

High Court of Gujarat Allows Revision Against Rejection of Plaint in SARFAESI Act Matter — Civil Court Suit Barred by Section 34 of SARFAESI Act. The court held that the borrower's suit challenging possession notice under SARFAESI Act was not maintainable as the remedy lies exclusively before the Debts Recovery Tribunal under Section 17 of the SARFAESI Act.

3 Mar 2026

The State Bank of India (SBI) filed a Civil Revision Application under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) challenging an order dat...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Attachment Order Under Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act — Creditor Can Execute Recovery Certificate Against Any Available Property Despite Prior SARFAESI Proceedings. The court held that there is no legal bar to a creditor simultaneously proceeding under the SARFAESI Act and executing a recovery certificate under Section 101 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 against other properties of the debtor.

25 Mar 2019

The petitioners, M/s Anjali Tours & Travels and Others, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging an attachment order issued by t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions by Financial Institutions Seeking Police Protection for Secured Asset Recovery Under SARFAESI Act — Held That Section 14 of SARFAESI Act Does Not Oust Writ Jurisdiction and That Police Authorities Must Provide Assistance for Recovery of Possession of Secured Assets.

27 Apr 2023

The judgment involves three writ petitions filed by financial institutions seeking police protection for recovery of possession of secured assets unde...

8 9 10 11 12

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)