Search Results for "Rule 273"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Rule 273"

628 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 628 result(s)

High Court

High Court Permits Official Liquidator to Break Open Lock and Take Physical Possession of Company Premises Despite Collusive Tenancy Decrees Obtained After Winding Up Without Leave Under Section 446 Companies Act, 1956. The court held that decrees obtained without leave under Section 446 are void and the Official Liquidator is entitled to possession.

30 Aug 2019

The Official Liquidator filed a report seeking permission to break open the lock put by the ex-management of J.B. Diamonds Limited (in liquidation) an...

High Court

Bombay High Court Division Bench Admitted and Heard Commercial Arbitration Appeal Challenging Single Judge's Refusal to Enforce Three Foreign Arbitral Awards Under Section 50 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Appeal Involves Enforcement Against Non-Signatory Related Companies and Alleged Asset Diversion Through Demerger Schemes to Defeat Execution of ICC London Awards Totaling Over USD 20 Million.

30 Dec 2025

The appeal originated from a dispute between Imax Corporation (appellant) and E-City Entertainment (I) Pvt. Ltd. (first respondent) arising from a Mas...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under Karnataka Act for Twelve Months in First Instance. Detention Order Held Illegal as Contravening Proviso to Section 3(2) and Supreme Court Precedent in Cherukuri Mani; Detenu Ordered Released.

18 Nov 2016

The petitioner, Yallappa, a poor coolie living with his wife and children in Raichur, was detained under the Karnataka Prevention of Dangerous Activit...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Process Against Directors in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Specific Allegations. Criminal proceedings under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 cannot be initiated against directors without specific averments of their role in the company's affairs.

28 Nov 2022

The case involves two criminal applications filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) challenging a common order dated...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Hears Appeal Against Trial Court Decree for Declaration and Possession of Party Premises; Issues of Maintainability of Representative Suit and Effect of Election Commission Recognition on Property Rights Considered

11 Oct 2013

The dispute concerns premises No.3, Race Course Road, Bangalore, claimed by the Indian National Congress through its Karnataka Pradesh Congress Commit...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition Against Order of Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal in Recovery Proceedings. The Case Involves Settlement and Auction of Property of Bradbury Mills Ltd., a Company in Liquidation, with Multiple Creditors and Guarantors.

28 Aug 2017

The writ petition was filed by Everest Fincap Pvt. Ltd. challenging an order of the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRAT) dated 22 August 2008, whic...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay hears writ petition challenging School Tribunal's reinstatement of teacher in termination dispute under Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977. The Court considered whether the inquiry committee properly followed Rules 36 and 37 of MEPS Rules, 1981, and whether legal evidence supported the charges.

29 Aug 2006

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay heard a writ petition filed by the management and headmaster of Janta High School, Shirol, challenging the Scho...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Defendant in Attachment Before Judgment Case — Failure to Prove Intent to Defeat Decree. Order 38 Rule 5 CPC Requires Clear Evidence of Intent to Obstruct Execution, Not Mere Threat to Sell Property.

1 Feb 2005

The appeal was filed by the original defendant, Mrs. Leela Sudhir Alekar, against an order dated 3 February 2000 passed by the trial court allowing th...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Writ Petition (PIL) – Cause Title Only. No substantive judgment text provided.

21 Jun 2016

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Late Filing Fee Under Section 234E of Income Tax Act. Petitioners Seek Declaration that Section 234E is Unconstitutional and Violative of Articles 14, 265, and 277.

12 Jun 2015

This batch of writ petitions was filed before the High Court of Karnataka under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the cons...

8 9 10 11 12

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)