Search Results for "Reservation lapsing"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Disposes Appeal by Consent Appointing Arbitrator in MSME Dispute, ...

Search Results for "Reservation lapsing"

154 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 154 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Refusal of Building Permission Due to Playground Reservation Under MRTP Act. Notice Under Section 127 Held Not Premature as 10-Year Period for Acquisition Had Expired.

13 Oct 2023

The petitioner, Irfan Allabaksh Shaikh, owned land bearing CTS No. 6167 in Siddheshwar Peth, Solapur, which was reserved as a playground (site No. 319...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Declaring Reservation Lapsed Under MRTP Act for Failure to Acquire Land Within 12 Months of Purchase Notice. Land Reserved for Parking Released as Authorities Took No Steps After Purchase Notice Under Section 127 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

4 May 2023

The petitioners, owners of land bearing CTS No. 352 & 352A, Final Plot No. 131/1, 131/2 in Nashik, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Cons...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds Land Owner's Consent Essential for Mode of Acquisition Under Section 126(1) MRTP Act — TDR Grant Requires Agreement, Not Unilateral Authority Action. The Court ruled that the option between monetary compensation and TDR under Section 126(1) of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 is not solely with the acquiring authority but requires the consent of the land owner.

25 Jul 2022

This judgment arises from a reference made by a Division Bench of the Bombay High Court at Nagpur, which disagreed with the view taken in Asha Sunil Z...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Writ Petitions on Lapsing of Land Acquisition Under Section 24 of the Right to Fair Compensation Act, 2013. Land Acquisition Proceedings Challenged for Non-Compliance with Provisions of the New Land Acquisition Law.

10 Mar 2016

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru heard a batch of writ petitions filed by various landowners against the State of Karnataka, the Mysore Urban ...

High Court

Karnataka High Court examines claims of land acquisition lapsing under Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 in writ petitions against Bangalore Development Authority and Mysore Urban Development Authority. The petitioners sought declarations that acquisition had lapsed under Section 24 of the 2013 Act, citing non-compliance with statutory timelines.

10 Mar 2016

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Petitions Seeking Declaration that Land Acquisition Proceedings Have Lapsed Under Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. Multiple petitioners challenged notifications and sought relief under Section 24 of the 2013 Act in connection with acquisitions by Bangalore Development Authority and Mysore Urban Development Authority.

10 Mar 2016

Multiple writ petitions were filed by various landowners challenging land acquisition proceedings initiated by the Bangalore Development Authority and...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petitions Seeking Declaration of Lapsed Land Acquisition Proceedings Under 2013 Act. Petitioners Claimed Acquisition Lapsed Due to Non-Compliance with Provisions of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013.

10 Mar 2016

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Multiple Writ Petitions on Land Acquisition Lapsing Under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. The petitions sought declarations that acquisition proceedings under the Bangalore Development Authority Act and Mysore Urban Development Authority Act had lapsed due to non-compliance with Section 24 of the 2013 Act.

10 Mar 2016

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Considers Writ Petitions Seeking Declaration of Lapse of Land Acquisition Proceedings Under Right to Fair Compensation Act, 2013. Petitioners Challenge Notifications and Awards Under Bangalore Development Authority Act Asserting Lapse Under Section 24 of 2013 Act.

10 Mar 2016

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru heard a batch of writ petitions filed between 2013 and 2015 by multiple landowners against the State of Karna...

High Court

KAHC010306442014_1

10 Mar 2016

...

8 9 10 11 12

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)