Search Results for "Prosecutrix Testimony"

350 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 350 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Allows Revision Petition, Discharges Accused in Rape Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence of Sexual Assault. Promise to Marry Not Proven as False from Inception Under Sections 376 and 417 IPC.

The petitioner, Sri George, filed a criminal revision petition under Section 397 read with Section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Allegation of Kidnapping and Sexual Assault Fails as Victim's Testimony Contradicts Medical Evidence and Prosecution Witnesses.

The appellant, Haji Kareem, was convicted by the II Additional Sessions Judge at Kalaburagi in Special Case (POCSO) No.5/2014 for offences under Secti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Hostile Witnesses. Conviction under Section 376 IPC Set Aside as Prosecutrix's Testimony Lacks Corroboration and Medical Evidence Does Not Support Rape.

The appellant, Sunil Kashinath Shelke, was convicted by the learned District Judge-5 and Additional Sessions Judge, Thane, in Sessions Case No.41 of 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction Under Sections 363, 376, 506, 342 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Age of Victim and Relied on Unreliable Sole Testimony.

The case involves an appeal against conviction for offences under Sections 363, 376, 506 and 342 IPC. The appellant, Dada Laxman Gaikwad, was convicte...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistencies in Prosecutrix's Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376 IPC Set Aside as Medical Evidence and Witness Testimonies Failed to Support Allegations of Sexual Assault.

The appellant, Dnyaneshwar Digambar Telang, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Yavatmal, for an offence punishable under Section 376 of the Indian P...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape of Minor Case Due to Contradictory Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(2)(f) IPC set aside as prosecutrix's evidence was inconsistent and medical evidence did not support rape.

The appellant, Onkar Timaji Shende, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Chandrapur, for the offence punishable under Section 376(2)(f) of the Indian ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape of Minor Case Due to Contradictory Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(2)(f) IPC set aside as prosecutrix's evidence was inconsistent and medical evidence did not support rape.

The appellant, Onkar Timaji Shende, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Chandrapur, for the offence punishable under Section 376(2)(f) of the Indian ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(1) IPC Set Aside as Prosecutrix's Testimony Found Unreliable and Medical Evidence Did Not Support Allegations.

The appellant, Maroti s/o Domaji Sadmake, was convicted by the trial court under Section 376(1) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 for allegedly raping a ...