High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Allegation of Kidnapping and Sexual Assault Fails as Victim's Testimony Contradicts Medical Evidence and Prosecution Witnesses.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: KALABURAGI In Favour of Accused
  • 44
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Haji Kareem, was convicted by the II Additional Sessions Judge at Kalaburagi in Special Case (POCSO) No.5/2014 for offences under Sections 366, 372(2)(n) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) and Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO Act). The case arose from an incident on 10.11.2013 when the victim, a 17-year-old girl, went out of her house to clean a plate and did not return. Her father, Narasappa (PW-1), filed a complaint. The victim was later recovered and alleged that the appellant kidnapped and sexually assaulted her. The trial court convicted the appellant based on the victim's testimony. On appeal, the High Court of Karnataka at Kalaburagi examined the evidence. The court found that the victim's testimony was inconsistent with the medical evidence and the statements of other prosecution witnesses. The medical evidence did not support the allegation of sexual assault. The court also noted that the victim's age was not conclusively proved to be below 18 years. The High Court held that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court allowed the appeal, set aside the conviction and sentence, and acquitted the appellant, giving him the benefit of doubt.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Benefit of Doubt - Inconsistent Testimony - Conviction under Sections 366, 372(2)(n) IPC and Section 6 of POCSO Act - Appeal against conviction - Victim's testimony inconsistent with medical evidence and other prosecution witnesses - Court held that prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt - Benefit of doubt given to appellant - Acquittal ordered (Paras 1-10).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the conviction under Sections 366, 372(2)(n) IPC and Section 6 of POCSO Act is sustainable based on the evidence on record.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal allowed. Conviction and sentence set aside. Appellant acquitted of all charges.

Law Points

  • Benefit of doubt
  • Inconsistent testimony
  • Lack of corroboration
  • Age determination
  • POCSO Act
  • Section 6
  • Section 366 IPC
  • Section 372(2)(n) IPC
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2021 LawText (KAR) (09) 42

Criminal Appeal No.200128 of 2017

2021-09-23

Mohammad Nawaz

Mahantesh H. Desai (for appellant), Gururaj V. Hasilkar (HCGP for respondent)

Haji Kareem

The State of Karnataka

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against conviction under POCSO Act and IPC

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought to set aside conviction and sentence and be acquitted

Filing Reason

Appellant was convicted for kidnapping and sexual assault of a minor

Previous Decisions

Trial court convicted appellant in Special Case (POCSO) No.5/2014 on 27.04.2017 and sentenced on 04.05.2017

Issues

Whether the conviction under Sections 366, 372(2)(n) IPC and Section 6 of POCSO Act is sustainable based on the evidence on record.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the victim's testimony was inconsistent and not corroborated by medical evidence. Respondent/State supported the trial court's judgment.

Ratio Decidendi

The prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt due to inconsistencies in the victim's testimony and lack of corroboration from medical evidence. Benefit of doubt given to the appellant.

Judgment Excerpts

In this appeal, Judgment and Order dated 27.04.2017/04.05.2017 passed by the II Addl. Sessions Judge at Kalaburagi in Special Case [POCSO] No.5/2014, convicting and sentencing the appellant for offences punishable under Sections 366, 372(2)(n) of IPC and Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 is under challenge.

Procedural History

Trial court convicted appellant on 27.04.2017 and sentenced on 04.05.2017. Appellant filed Criminal Appeal No.200128 of 2017 under Section 374(2) CrPC before the High Court of Karnataka, Kalaburagi Bench. High Court heard the appeal and delivered judgment on 23.09.2021.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC): 366, 372(2)(n)
  • Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO Act): 6
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC): 374(2)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Quashes Lok Adalat Award in Non-Compoundable Excise Offence Case — Lok Adalat Lacks Jurisdiction to Determine Non-Compoundable Offences. Reference by Magistrate to Lok Adalat for Non-Compoundable Offence Under Sections 32 an...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Allegation of Kidnapping and Sexual Assault Fails as Victim's Testimony Contradicts Medical Evidence and Prosecution Witnesses.