Search Results for "No-confidence motion"

103 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 103 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Sarpanch's Challenge to No-Confidence Motion in Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act Case — Caste Validity Certificate Issue Not Decided by Competent Authority, No Right to Speak in No-Confidence Meeting.

The petitioner, Yogini w/o Sanjay Deshmukh, was the elected Sarpanch of Village Panchayat Mandawa. A no-confidence motion was initiated against her, a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Removal of Sarpanch in No-Confidence Motion for Violation of Mandatory Notice Requirements Under Bombay Village Panchayats (Meeting) Rules, 1959. Failure to Provide Three Days' Notice to Sarpanch Renders No-Confidence Motion Invalid.

The petitioner, Nirmala w/o Pandharinath Sarde (Shiralkar), was the Sarpanch of Shirala Village Panchayat. She was removed from the post by a no-confi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Removal of Sarpanch for Violation of Mandatory Notice Requirements Under Bombay Village Panchayats (Meeting) Rules, 1959. No-confidence motion invalid as three-day notice not given to Sarpanch and motion not properly moved for voting.

The petitioner, Nirmala w/o Pandharinath Sarde (Shiralkar), was the Sarpanch of Shirala Village Panchayat. On 22.12.2023, an extraordinary meeting was...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging No-Confidence Motion Against Upa-Sarpanch. 3/4th Majority for Removal of Upa-Sarpanch Must Be Calculated Based on Total Members of Panchayat, Not Only Those Present and Voting.

The petitioner, Archna Phulare, was the Upa-Sarpanch of Shivgaon-Pathari Gram Panchayat. A no-confidence motion was passed against her by 7 votes to 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging No-Confidence Motion Against Upa-Sarpanch. 3/4th Majority for Removal of Upa-Sarpanch Must Be Calculated Based on Total Members of Panchayat, Not Only Those Present and Voting.

The petitioner, Archna Phulare, was the Upa-Sarpanch of Shivgaon-Pathari Gram Panchayat. A no-confidence motion was passed against her by 7 votes to 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Removal of Adhyaksha of Grama Panchayat; Rule 3(7) of Karnataka Panchayat Raj (Motion of No Confidence) Rules, 1994, Prohibits Debate, and Non-Recording of Reasons Does Not Vitiate the Proceedings.

The petitioner, Smt. Gangambike, had been elected as a member of Koppa Grama Panchayat, Piriyapatna Taluk, on 17 May 2010, and subsequently as Adhyaks...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Considers Appeal Against Order Upholding Notice for No-Confidence Motion Against Municipal President. Single Judge Found No Requirement of Personal Service Under Section 47(2) of Karnataka Municipalities Act, 1964.

The writ appeal arose from a dispute regarding the convening of a special meeting of the City Municipal Council, Tumkur, to consider a no-confidence m...