Search Results for "Ministerial Act"

275 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 275 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses State's Appeals in Promotion Dispute — Executive Instructions Cannot Override Statutory Recruitment Rules. Promotion to Assistant Regional Transport Officer must be based on statutory rules, not executive instructions, and seniority cannot be ignored.

The case involves two appeals by the State of Odisha against a common judgment of the Orissa High Court, which dismissed intra-court appeals by the St...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Petition Challenging OROP Policy Implementation for Ex-Servicemen. Periodic Revision Every Five Years Upheld as Not Arbitrary Under Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India.

The dispute arose from a petition under Article 32 of the Constitution challenging the implementation of the One Rank One Pension (OROP) policy for ex...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Judgment Debtor's Writ Petition Challenging Execution of Possession Decree in Landlord-Tenant Dispute. Repeated objections to execution of decree for possession of two rooms rejected as abuse of process under Order 21 Rule 35 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

The petitioner, Warna Valley Sahkari Kharedi Vikri Society Limited, was the tenant of the respondents in a suit property. The respondents filed Regula...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Allows Bank's Petition Against Registrar's Refusal to Register Original Application in Debt Recovery Case. Registrar's Role is Ministerial and Cannot Decide Tenability Under Rule 5 of Debts Recovery Tribunal (Procedure) Rules, 1993.

The petitioner, Bank of India, a nationalized bank, had granted financial assistance to a limited company, with Ms. Avantika Chauhan as a guarantor. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Extension of Toll Collection Period in BOT Road Project. Court holds that concession period extension is a contractual matter and not subject to judicial review under Article 226 in absence of arbitrariness or public interest violation.

The petitioners, claiming to be public-spirited citizens, filed a writ petition in public interest challenging the decision of the State of Maharashtr...