Search Results for "Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act 1961"

106 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 106 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Additional Commissioner's Orders in Gram Panchayat Disqualification Appeals. Delegation of Powers Under Section 13(3) of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 Remains Valid Despite Amendment to Section 16(2) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1958.

The petitioner, Amitkumar Bankar, challenged orders of the Additional Commissioner dated 18.01.2023 that set aside the Collector's disqualification of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Disqualification of Sarpanch and Members for Violation of Natural Justice. Orders of Additional Collector and Additional Divisional Commissioner under Section 53 of Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961 set aside for failure to provide hearing.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by petitioners who were elected members of the Gram Panchayat of Nadarpur, including the Sarpanch. They...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Regularisation of Shikshan Sevak Service — Petitioner Entitled to Benefit of Government Resolution Dated 15.5.2013 for Counting Past Service as Shikshan Sevak Towards Regularisation.

The petitioner, Rajendra s/o Shriram Bhujbal, was appointed as Shikshan Sevak on 12.7.2010 by the Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Jalna. He f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Appointment of Sarpanch Due to Invalid Meeting of District Selection Committee. The Court held that the meeting lacked quorum under Section 31(2) of the Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961, rendering the appointment illegal.

The petitioner, Sachin Hanuman Phad, filed a Writ Petition challenging the appointment of Respondent No.5, Datta Shvajirao Pawar, as Sarpanch of Gram ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner in Service Matter Challenging Withholding of Increments Without Enquiry. Major Penalty of Permanently Withholding Increments Requires Departmental Enquiry Under Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961.

The petitioner, Narendra Motiram Bodkhe, an employee of Zilla Parishad, Wardha, challenged the order dated 9.8.1994 passed by the Chief Executive Offi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions of Daily Wage Employees Challenging Termination — Appointments Were Irregular and Not Entitled to Regularisation. Termination Due to Completion of Project Is Not Illegal and Industrial Disputes Act Does Not Apply to Zilla Parishad.

The petitioners, 24 daily wage employees of Zilla Parishad, Dhule, filed writ petitions challenging their termination of services. They were appointed...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Disqualification of Councillor for Defection Under Maharashtra Local Authority Members Disqualification Act, 1986 — Failure to Prove Merger of Original Political Party Results in Confirmation of Disqualification Order.

The case involves two writ petitions filed by councillors of the Municipal Council, Sonpeth, challenging their disqualification under the Maharashtra ...