Bombay High Court Quashes Appointment of Sarpanch Due to Invalid Meeting of District Selection Committee. The Court held that the meeting lacked quorum under Section 31(2) of the Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961, rendering the appointment illegal.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Prosecution
  • 62
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Sachin Hanuman Phad, filed a Writ Petition challenging the appointment of Respondent No.5, Datta Shvajirao Pawar, as Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Dhavalesher, Taluka Bhokardan, District Jalna. The petitioner contended that the meeting of the District Selection Committee held on 30th December 2015 was invalid for lack of quorum, as only two members were present instead of the required three under Section 31(2) of the Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961. The respondents argued that the meeting was validly conducted. The High Court examined the provisions of the Act and found that the quorum for the District Selection Committee is three members. Since only two members were present, the meeting was invalid. Consequently, the appointment of Respondent No.5 as Sarpanch was quashed and set aside. The Court directed the authorities to take steps for the election of a new Sarpanch in accordance with law.

Headnote

A) Local Self-Government - Quorum - District Selection Committee - Section 31(2) of the Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961 - The meeting of the District Selection Committee held on 30th December 2015 was invalid for want of quorum as only two members were present instead of the required three. The Court held that the appointment of Respondent No.5 as Sarpanch based on such invalid meeting is illegal and liable to be set aside (Paras 7-10).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the meeting of the District Selection Committee held on 30th December 2015 was valid in the absence of the required quorum, and consequently, whether the appointment of Respondent No.5 as Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Dhavalesher is illegal.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Writ Petition is allowed. The appointment of Respondent No.5 as Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Dhavalesher is quashed and set aside. The respondents are directed to take steps for election of a new Sarpanch in accordance with law.

Law Points

  • Quorum requirement for District Selection Committee
  • Validity of meeting without quorum
  • Appointment of Sarpanch under Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act
  • 1961
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2016 LawText (BOM) (07) 33

Writ Petition No. 200 of 2016

2016-07-19

S.S. Shinde, Sangitrao S. Patil

Mr. Shrimant Mundhe, Mr. S.B. Yawalkar, Mr. A.D. Aghav

Sachin S/o Hanuman Phad

State of Maharashtra, President (District Collector), Chief Executive Officer, Deputy Chief Executive Officer, Datta S/o Shvajirao Pawar

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ Petition challenging the appointment of Respondent No.5 as Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Dhavalesher.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought quashing of the appointment of Respondent No.5 as Sarpanch and a direction for fresh election.

Filing Reason

The meeting of the District Selection Committee held on 30th December 2015 was invalid for lack of quorum.

Issues

Whether the meeting of the District Selection Committee held on 30th December 2015 was valid in the absence of quorum? Whether the appointment of Respondent No.5 as Sarpanch is illegal and liable to be set aside?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the meeting lacked quorum as only two members were present instead of the required three under Section 31(2) of the Act. Respondents contended that the meeting was validly conducted and the appointment was legal.

Ratio Decidendi

The quorum for the District Selection Committee is three members as per Section 31(2) of the Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961. Since only two members were present, the meeting was invalid, and any appointment made therein is illegal.

Judgment Excerpts

The meeting of the District Selection Committee held on 30th December 2015 was invalid for want of quorum. The appointment of Respondent No.5 as Sarpanch is quashed and set aside.

Procedural History

The Writ Petition was filed in 2016, reserved on 11th July 2016, and pronounced on 19th July 2016.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961: Section 31(2)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Appointment of Sarpanch Due to Invalid Meeting of District Selection Committee. The Court held that the meeting lacked quorum under Section 31(2) of the Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961, rendering ...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioners' Challenge to Land Acquisition for Children's Playground — Upholds Validity of Notification Under MRTP Act and Land Acquisition Act. Change of Purpose from Hospital to Playground Does Not Vitiate Acquisition ...