Search Results for "MEPS Rules"

253 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 253 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Termination of Headmaster by School Society. Termination set aside as disciplinary enquiry was not initiated by the President as required under Section 5 of the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977.

The petitioner, Gajanan Narayan Jadhao, was appointed as an Assistant Teacher on 1 December 1998 in a school run by the respondent society, Shri Shiva...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Management's Petitions Challenging School Tribunal's Order Quashing Termination of Teacher. Repeated Denovo Enquiries After Earlier Enquiries Are Quashed for Non-Compliance of Rules 36/37 of MEPS Rules, 1981 Are Impermissible.

The judgment involves two writ petitions filed by the Head Master (brother of the President) and the President of the educational institution, challen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Management's Petitions in Teacher Termination Case. Repeated Denovo Enquiries After Quashing for Non-Compliance of MEPS Rules 36 and 37 Are Not Permissible.

The case involves two writ petitions filed by the Head Master (brother of the President) and the President of an educational institution challenging t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Teacher Challenging Termination, Sets Aside School Tribunal's Findings on Qualification and Workload. Petitioner's 9-year service as Assistant Teacher teaching Std. V to VII held sufficient to establish qualification and workload under MEPS Act.

The petitioner, Dinkar Sitaram Jadhav, was appointed as an Assistant Teacher at Shri Sant Gulab Baba Vidyalaya, a school run by Shri Dattatraya Shiksh...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal of Teacher in Termination Dispute Due to Lack of Approval by Education Officer. Appointment of Assistant Teacher Without Approval Under Section 5 of MEPS Act and Rules Renders Termination Not Actionable Under Section 9 of MEPS Act.

The appellant, Sudhakar Trimbakrao Kalmegh, was appointed as an Assistant Teacher in a school administered by respondent no.1 society on 15th July 199...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes School Tribunal Order in Teacher Appointment Dispute — Remands for Fresh Consideration of MEPS Act Compliance. Appointment Validity Requires Examination of Roster Point and Vacancy Nature Under Section 5 of MEPS Act.

The petitioner, Pramod s/o Shamrao Bhandarkar, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 11th April 2005 passed by the Additional School Tribun...